About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

17 GLOSSAE: Eur. J. Legal Hist. 120 (2020)
About the Concept of the 'Dangerous Individual' in Turn-of-the-Century Penal Reform: Debates on Recidivism, Etat Dangereux, Indeterminate Sentencing, and Civil Liberty in the International Union of Penal Law, 1889-1914

handle is hein.journals/glosse17 and id is 120 raw text is: 






                         About   the concept  of the  'dangerous   individual'
                               in turn-of-the-century penal reform:
             Debates   on recidivism,  itat dangereux,   indeterminate sentencing, and
                civil liberty in the International   Union  of Penal  Law,   1889-1914

                                                                                    Richard  F. Wetzell
                                                             German Historical Institute   Washington

                                                                                         Received: 28.4.2020
                                                                                         Accepted: 25.7.2020

Abstract
Alluding to Michel Foucault's famous article on the concept of the 'dangerous individual' in 19th-century legal
psychiatry in the title,1 this article provides an overview of the founding of the International Union of Penal Law
(IUPL), its penal reform agenda and major activities, before turning to a detailed examination and analysis of the
IUPL's debates, at its congresses from 1889 to 1913, on a central topic: special measures to be taken against so-
called incorrigible habitual criminals or dangerous recidivists (the terminology varied over time). By analyzing
recurring patterns of argumentation as well as their development over time, the article pursues three goals. First, it
reveals the IUPL's failure to live up to its own demand   that penal policy should be based on  empirical
criminological and penological research; second, it elucidates the role of civil liberty concerns within the IUPL by
demonstrating that prominent critical voices objected to subjective criteria for dangerousness and to indeterminate
sentencing as threats to individual freedom; third, by tracing the role of the three founders in these debates, it offers
a fresh comparison of the penal reform agendas of Liszt, van Hamel, and Prins.

Keywords
International Union of Penal Law, Union Internationale de Droit Penal, Internationale Kriminalistische Vereinigung,
transnational penal reform, habitual criminals, recidivism, incorrigibility, dangerousness, 6tat dangereux,
indeterminate sentencing, security measures, mental deficiency, social defense, modern school, positivism, Franz
von Liszt, Adolphe Prins, and Gerard Anton van Hamel



Summary: 1. The founding of the IUPL. 2. The three founders: Liszt, van Hamel, and Prins. 3.
The  IUPL's  reform  agenda.  4. The  first phase (1889-1894):  IUPL   debates  on recidivism, habitual
criminality, indeterminate   sentencing,  and civil liberty. 5. The second  phase  (1905-1913):   IUPL
debates   on   tat   dangereux, security measures, and individual liberty. 6. Conclusions.
Bibliographical  References











        * This work has been undertaken in the context of the International GERN Seminar (Groupe Europ~en de
Recherches sur les Normativites) organized by Yves Cartuyvels (University of Saint-Louis - Bruxelles, Belgium)
and  Aniceto Masferrer (University of Valencia, Spain), and of the research project entitled Las influencias
extranjeras en la Codificaci6n penal espanola: su concreto alcance  en la Parte Especial de  los C6digos
decimon6nicos  (ref. DER2016-78388-P), funded by  the Spanish 'Ministerio de Economia y  Competitividad'
(2017-2020) and by the Groupe Europ~en de Recherches sur les Normativites (GERN) Interlabo (2019-2020).
        1 Foucault, M., About the Concept of the 'Dangerous Individual' in 19th-Century Legal Psychiatry,
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 1 (1978), pp. 1-18.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most