38 Ga. L. Rev. 1369 (2003-2004)
Lacks v. McKechnie and the Quest for On-Sale Bar Certainty

handle is hein.journals/geolr38 and id is 1393 raw text is: LACKS V. MCKECHNIE AND THE QUEST FOR
ON-SALE BAR CERTAINTY
I. INTRODUCTION
The on-sale bar operates to prevent inventors from obtaining a
patent if they have offered their invention for sale in the United
States more than one year prior to filing for patent.' Although the
statutory language seems relatively simple, application of the on-
sale bar is anything but clear.2 Very early in the history of on-sale
bar jurisprudence, the courts abandoned the plain language of the
statute and developed a complex set of rules for applying the bars.3
In 1998, however, the Supreme Court stepped in to ameliorate what
had become a rather volatile and unpredictable area of patent
law.' In Pfaffv. Wells Electronics, Inc.,' because of the interest in
certainty, the Court overruled the Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit's totality of the circumstances7 and substantially com-
plete8 tests, setting forth a new, two-prong test for determination
of the on-sale bar: The on-sale bar applies when two conditions are
satisfied before the critical date.' First, the product must be the
subject of a commercial offer for sale .... Second, the invention
' See 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) (2000) (A person shall be entitled to a patent unless ... the
invention was . . . on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the
application for patent in the United States ....).
2 See John F. Sweeney & Charles H. Sanders, The On-Sale Bar to Patentability:
Understanding the Doctrine's Past, Present, and Future, 532 PRACTICING L. INST., PAT.
COPYRIGHTS, & LITERARY PROP. COURSE HANDBOOK SERIEs 157, 159 (1998), available at WL
532 PLI/PAT 157 (noting that on-sale bar has confounded the Federal Circuit, spurred
considerable legal debate, and left inventors feeling vulnerable to the prevailing judicial
winds).
3 William C. Rooklidge, The On Sale and Public Use Bars to Patentability: The Policies
Reexamined, 1 FED. CIRCUIT B.J. 7, 8 (1991).
4 Edward G. Poplawski & Paul D. Tripodi, II, The Impact of Federal Circuit Precedent
on the On-Sale and *Public-Use'Bars to Patentability, 44 AM. U. L. REV. 2351,2390 (1995).
6 525 U.S. 55 (1998).
6 Id. at 66.
7 See infra notes 97-101 and accompanying text.
s See infra notes 107-12 and accompanying text.
The critical date is one year before the filing date of the patent application, and is
determined retrospectively. Baker Oil Tools, Inc. v. Geo Vann, Inc., 828 F.2d 1558, 1563 (Fed.
Cir. 1987).

1369

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing nearly 2,700 academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline with pricing starting as low as $29.95

Access to this content requires a subscription. Please visit the following page to request a quote or trial:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?