About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

52 Geo. J. Int'l L. 835 (2020-2021)
The National Security Exception in WTO Law: Emerging Jurisprudence and Future Direction

handle is hein.journals/geojintl52 and id is 852 raw text is: THE NATIONAL SECURITY EXCEPTION IN WTO LAW: EMERGING JURISPRUDENCE AND FUTURE DIRECTION JACOB GLADYSz* ABSTRACT The original General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT 1947) was written with a broadly worded national security exception. This national security exception was copied into the founding agreements of today's World Trade Organization (WTO). The exception allows a contracting party, under certain specified circum- stances, to take any action which it considers necessary for the protection of its essen- tial security interests notwithstanding other INTO commitments. Despite the national security exception's potential as an almost total escape clause from INTO commitments, it was rarely invoked and even more rarely adjudicated. That is, until now. Over the past five years, a number of WTO members-includ- ing the United States-have invoked the national security exception as a defense to alleged violations of WTO commitments. Additionally, in 2019 and 2020, the WTO Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) interpreted the scope of the national security exception for the first time in two landmark decisions: Russia - Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit and Saudi Arabia - Measures Concerning the Protection of Intellectual Property. This Note analyzes the Russia and Saudi Arabia decisions and explores what they mean for future applications of the national security exception in WTO law. It suggests that despite the common approach applied in the Russia and Saudi Arabia cases, the future direction of the WTO's national security exception is far from clear. Within the Russia and Saudi Arabia decisions lie significant ambigu- ities that will condition both the future use and adjudication of the national secu- rity exception. This Note uses the United States' invocation of the national security exception to defend its Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs to demonstrate the variety of outcomes that could result from future application of the Russia/Saudi Arabia decisions. With the collision between national security and trade showing no signs of abating, navigating the jurisprudential ambiguities of the national se- curity exception will be a critical task for the WTO. I. INTRODUCTION .................................... 836 II. NATIONAL SECURITY IN WTO AGREEMENTS .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 838 * J.D. Candidate 2022, Georgetown University Law Center. The author extends his thanks to Professor Timothy C. Brightbill for his guidance and encouragement throughout the process of writing this note. © 2021,Jacob Gladysz. 835

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most