About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

46 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 457 (2018-2019)
Fair Housing Act at 50: Challenging the Disparate Impact of Predictive Analytics

handle is hein.journals/flsulr46 and id is 477 raw text is: 







       FAIR HOUSING ACT AT 50: CHALLENGING THE
       DISPARATE IMPACT OF PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS


                                 KODY GLAZER

                                     ABSTRACT
    The year 2018 marked the 50th Anniversary of the enactment of the Fair Housing Act. Alt-
hough there have been mixed reviews on the success of the Act in reaching its goals of eradicating
discrimination from the housing market and of affirmatively furthering fair housing, one thing
remains clear-the Act must evolve and react to changing technologies to reach its full potential
in the twenty-first century. Gone are the days where housing providers violate the Act by advertis-
ing homes to whites only or with statements that say, Irish need not apply.
    Today, housing providers can discriminate by relying on predictive algorithms that feed
off of the massive amounts of data-gathering techniques that exist in the digital world. In-
stead of refusing to advertise to Latino or African-American families outright, housing pro-
viders can devise algorithms that exclude Latinos or African-Americans based on stand-in
data or proxies. Given the secretive nature of these algorithms, it can be nearly impossible to
prove an intent to discriminate based on a protected class.
    This Note explores how the disparate-impact theory of liability under the Fair Housing
Act can be used to challenge discriminatory algorithms and the data that forms them, spe-
cifically in regard to advertising. This Note explores how some data points within algo-
rithms exist only to create disparate impacts on protected classes without having any ties to
a legitimate housing purpose.
    Part I will introduce the scope of the issue and the detrimental effects that housing seg-
regation can have on our communities. Part II will provide an analysis of the Fair Housing
Act and how it applies to discriminatory advertising. Part III will describe big data, predic-
tive analytics, and how housing providers have the potential to gather large amounts of
information on individuals in the housing market. Finally, Part IV will apply the Fair
Housing  Act's disparate-impact theory of liability to the algorithms that shape decisions
about how to advertise housing and discuss the challenges within.
    Addressing the disparate impact of predictive analytics will be difficult in practice. Yet,
in the era of Big Data, it is essential to be at the forefront of changing technologies to protect
those who are most vulnerable in our society.


     I. INTRODUCTION..............................      .............................. 458
     II. THE FAIR HOUSING ACT        .................................................... 460
         A. The FHA's Prohibition Against Unlawful Advertising Practices...............  460
         B. Section 804(c) Should Cover Advertising Decisions Made by
            Algorithms ...............        ......................... ..........  461
         C. Disparate-Impact Theory of Liability Under the FHA .....  .............  462
         D. Standing Under the Fair Housing Act   ....................... ....... 464
         E. Potential Communications Decency Act Concerns...................... 465
   III. PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS-BIG   DATA AT WORK       .............. .................  466
         A. What Information is Collected and How is it Collected? The Basics .........  466
         B. How Data is Used to Create Individual Profiles.... ................... 469
         C. Downsides and Potential Liability in Big Data Use........... .........  470
    IV. APPLYING A DISPARATE-IMPACT  THEORY  OF LIABILITY TO CHALLENGE
        AUTOMATED   DECISION MAKING  UNDER THE  FAIR HOUSING ACT......................  477
        A.  The Black Box of Automated Decision Making ......      .................. 477
        B.  Establishing Prima Facie Case of Disparate Impact-An Algorithm as
            the Challenged Policy ............................................  479
         C. Business Justification- Weeding Out Irrelevant Data Points ...................  480
         D. Identifying Less Discriminatory Alternatives-Cleaning Up the
            Algorithm       ......................................... ............  482
    V.  CONCLUSION                         .............................................................. 482

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most