About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

83 Fordham L. Rev. 3431 (2014-2015)
No Harm, No Foul: Attempted Invasion of Privacy and the Tort of Intrusion upon Seclusion

handle is hein.journals/flr83 and id is 3493 raw text is: NO HARM, NO FOUL? ATTEMPTED INVASION OF PRIVACY AND THE TORT OF INTRUSION UPON SECLUSION Eli A. Meltz* The tort of intrusion upon seclusion protects individuals from unwanted invasions into their personal space and personal affairs. While courts differ as to the precise definition and scope of this tort, at the most basic level, a claim for intrusion upon seclusion alleges that the defendant has unreasonably interfered with the plaintiffs legitimate interest in maintaining some degree of privacy in his or her personal affairs. This Note analyzes an interesting issue that has emerged concerning the application of this tort: Should a defendant be held liable when he or she has attempted to observe the plaintiff in a private setting but is ultimately unsuccessful? Some courts have held that the mere placement of surveillance equipment that is capable of transforming a private space into a public one constitutes an intrusion, even if the defendant never uses the device to view or hear the plaintiff. Other courts, however, have held that the plaintiff must prove that the defendant overheard, viewed, or otherwise observed the plaintiff using the device. This Note analyzes the underlying basis and purpose of the intrusion tort and argues that a plaintiff should not need to prove that the defendant actually used the device to see or hear the plaintiff-in other words, the placement alone of surveillance equipment is an invasion of the plaintiff's privacy and should be sufficient to state a claim for intrusion upon seclusion. IN TRODU CTION ........................................................................................ 3432 I. THE DEVELOPMENT AND RECOGNITION OF INTRUSION UPON SECLUSION IN THE UNITED STATES ............................................. 3434 A. History and Development of the Right of Privacy ................. 3434 B. Legal Sources of the Right of Privacy ................................... 3436 C. Jurisdictional Overview and Comparative Analysis of Intrusion upon Seclusion ....................................................... 3438 3431 * J.D. Candidate, 2016, Fordham University School of Law; B.A., 2010, Cornell University. I would like to thank my parents and Hilary for their support. Many thanks as well to Professor Benjamin Zipursky for his invaluable insight and guidance throughout this process.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most