About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

77 Fordham L. Rev. 1095 (2008-2009)
Interpreting the Phrase Newly Discovered Evidence: May Previously Unavailable Exculpatory Testimony Serve as the Basis for a Motion for a New Trial under Rule 33

handle is hein.journals/flr77 and id is 1101 raw text is: NOTES INTERPRETING THE PHRASE NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE: MAY PREVIOUSLY UNAVAILABLE EXCULPATORY TESTIMONY SERVE AS THE BASIS FOR A MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL UNDER RULE 33? Mary Ellen Brennan* Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure permits a federal court to grant a new trial to a criminal defendant if the interest of ustice so requires, specifying as one potential basis the availability of newly discovered evidence. The federal circuit courts have disagreed as to whether postconviction testimony proffered by a codefendant who had remained silent at trial may serve as the basis for a Rule 33 motion grounded on newly discovered evidence. A majority of the federal circuits, including, most recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, have held that, while a codefendant's posttrial offer of exculpatory testimony may constitute newly available evidence, it does not constitute newly discovered evidence, as Rule 33 requires. Conversely, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has concluded that Rule 33's reference to newly discovered evidence does include a codefendant's newly available testimony. The history of Rule 33 and the conflict among the circuit courts regarding the interpretation of the phrase newly discovered evidence reveals a tension between courts' desire to protect legitimate convictions against posttrial attack based on unreliable or false testimony and the need to exonerate the wrongly convicted. In view of these conflicting policies, this Note advocates an approach that aligns with the history, purpose, and text of Rule 33 and yields fair and efficient results. INTRODUCTION In 2004, Special Agents Joe Doherty and Chris Oksala of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) stopped Lance Edgar Owen as he 1095 * J.D. Candidate, 2009, Fordham University School of Law; B.A., 2005, Barnard College. I would like to thank Professor Bruce Green for his insight during the Note-writing process and my parents, grandparents, and brothers for their kindness and support.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most