About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

72 Fed. Probation 37 (2008)
Juvenile Sex Offenders and Sex Offender Legislation: Unintended Consequences

handle is hein.journals/fedpro72 and id is 201 raw text is: December 2008                                                                                        37
Nancy G. Calley, University of Detroit Mercy
Spectrum Human Services, Inc. & Affiliated Companies

DURING THE 1990S, growing concerns
from sexual offenders regarding public safety
prompted legislation to be enacted through-
out the United States. The two primary
pieces of legislation resulted in sex offender
registration and sex offender notification,
both of which were designed to promote
public knowledge and visibility of convicted
sex offenders. Whereas crimes committed by
adult sex offenders against children directly
influenced the creation of this legislation
(i.e., Megan Kanka and Jason Wetterling),
several states have since included juvenile
sex offenders in their legislation (Center for
Sex Offender Management, 2005). The inclu-
sion of juvenile sex offenders in registration
and community notification has sparked a
great deal of debate as academics, criminolo-
gists and lawyers have discussed a range of
implications. Two primary discussions have
focused on the legislation's interaction with
civil rights of juvenile offenders (Turoff,
2001) and with the rehabilitative philosophy
of the juvenile justice system (Hiller, 1998;
Swearingen, 1997; Trivits & Reppucci, 2002).
In addition to these controversial issues,
a small body of empirical research on sex
offender legislation has begun to emerge
addressing such issues as the efficacy of the
legislation on sexual recidivism (Petrosino
& Petrosino, 1999; Vasquez, Maddan, &
Walker, 2008), characteristics of registered
juvenile and adult sex offenders (Craun &
Kernsmith, 2006), and public perceptions
of sex offender legislation (Phillips, 1998;
Proctor, Badzinski, & Johnson, 2002; Zevitz
1 This study was funded through the U.S. Bureau
of Justice Assistance-Comprehensive Approaches
to Sex Offender Management program.

& Farkas, 2000). Missing from the empiri-
cal research, however, is an examination of
the effect of the legislation on juvenile sex
offenders, and more specifically, the pos-
sible effect of the legislation on dispositional
decision-making and subsequent treatment
implications for these youth.
This article intends to begin to address this
gap in the literature through an examination
of the treatment implications associated with
possible efforts likely to be motivated partly
or largely to avoid juvenile sex offender reg-
istration. To accomplish this, one full year of
juvenile sex offense data from initial charge
to treatment outcome was analyzed in a large,
urban Midwest region. The findings suggest
a possible unintended consequence of sex
offender legislation on juvenile sex offenders:
withholding juvenile sex offender treatment
for youth that have committed sex crimes as
a result of reduced charges at disposition in
order to avoid registration requirements.
Review of the Literature
In 1994, President Bill Clinton signed the
Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children
and Sexually Violent Registration Act (Jacob
Wetterling Act). The Jacob Wetterling Act
established a national registry for sex offend-
ers who committed sexual offenses against
children or adults or violent offenses against
children. Following the inception of the Wet-
terling Act, several other pieces of legislation
were enacted, including: 1) Megan's Law, 1996
(requiring community notification); 2) the
Pam Lychner Sexual Offender Tracking and
Identification Act of 1996 (heightening regis-
tration requirements for certain serious and
repeat offenders); 3) the Appropriations Act

for the Departments of Commerce, Justice,
and State, the Judiciary of 1998 (basing reg-
istration on a range of offenses specified by
state law); and 4) the Jeanne Clery Disclosure
of Campus Security Police and Campus Crime
Act of 2000 (requiring colleges and universi-
ties to notify the campus community about
registered sex offenders on campus (Michigan
State Police, 2006). It should be noted that
although none of this legislation required
states to register juvenile sex offenders, 32
states currently require some or all juvenile
sex offenders to register and six states have
developed separate registration laws for juve-
niles and adults (National Sexual Behaviors of
Youth, 2008). The most recent legislation, the
Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act
of 2006, was signed into law in August, 2006.
This Act establishes a comprehensive national
system for the registration of sex offenders,
including juvenile offenders 14 years of age or
older whose offense (or attempted offense) was
comparable to or more severe than aggravated
sexual abuse. The Adam Walsh Act is by far
the most comprehensive piece of sex offender
legislation that specifically includes juvenile
sex offenders. Briefly, the Act contains several
provisions related to the type of informa-
tion that can be disclosed about the offender,
the duration of registration requirements,
and the extent of community notification,
among other issues. States have three years
from the passage of the Act to comply with
its requirements.
Because of the far-reaching nature of
the registration and community notification
laws, sex offenders have been significantly
differentiated from other types of offenders.
As a result, there has been a great deal of

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most