8 Eur. L. Rep. 1 (2004)

handle is hein.journals/eurlawreo8 and id is 1 raw text is: [2004] EuLR

Value Added Tax Tribunal
(London Tribunal Centre)
Dr Nuala Brice (Chairman)
15 January 2003
Directions hearing - Disclosure - Access to documents - Duty of European
Commission to produce documents to national court under Zwartveld orders-
Value Added Tax Tribunal Rules 1986
S & S Services Ltd (the appellant) appealed to the VAT Tribunal against post-
clearance demands made by Customs and Excise in respect of consignments of fruit
juice imported from Israel during the period from 1995 to 1999. S & S Services Ltd
sought disclosure of certain documents held by Customs and Excise, including a copy
of a Mission Report, and if there was no such report, then other documentation
D  arising from the joint enquiries carried out in Israel by the European Commission.
Customs and Excise requested these documents from the Commission, which
responded that S & S Services Ltd should write to the Commission directly to request
access to the documents, in accordance with Regulation No. 1049/2001.
The VAT Tribunal ordered the issue of a witness summons to the Head of
Representation at the London office of the European Commission. The Commission
responded by sending to the Tribunal two bundles of documents, one with confiden-
E  tial documents, the other with non-confidential documents, and a witness summons
stating that all the documents had been treated pursuant to the orders of the European
Court of Justice in Case C-2/88 Criminal Proceedings against Zwartveld and others
[1990] ECR 1-3365, [1990] ECR 1-4405.
All the documents received by the VAT Tribunal in the confidential bundle appeared
in the non-confidential bundle. Parts of 11 of the documents in the confidential bundle
F  had been deleted before copying for the non-confidential bundle.
1. Under the Zwartveld orders, the European Commission was obliged to produce to
a national authority (e.g. a court) the documents which it had requested, unless
G     it had imperative reasons relating to the need to avoid any interference with the
functioning and independence of the Communities justifying its refusal to do so.
See post p. 6E-H.
2. Apart from three deletions, all deletions in the confidential bundle came within the
Zwartveld principles, either because the deleted text was a legitimate exclusion
connected with the protection of the rights of third parties, or because the deleted
H     text did not concern the actual facts at issue before the Tribunal in the appeal. See
post p. 8B-D.

Q 2004 Hart Publishing Ltd.
CCC 1091-3297/04/010001-11

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing nearly 2,700 academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.

Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline with pricing starting as low as $29.95

Access to this content requires a subscription. Please visit the following page to request a quote or trial:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?