About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

40 Dublin U. L.J. 107 (2017)
Revisiting Article 41.2

handle is hein.journals/dubulj40 and id is 369 raw text is: 










                      Revisiting Article 41.2


                             Laura Cahillane*






Throughout  the history of Bunreacht na hEireann, Article 41.2 has been one
of the  most  consistently controversial provisions. From the moment   the
Constitution was  published, this provision provoked  anger from  women's
groups and for a long time now it has been generally recognised that this pro-
vision is in need of reform. Following years of vague promises to take action,
the Government   recently announced  its intention to hold a referendum on
Article 41.2 in the coming year. However, at present, it is unclear whether the
referendum  proposal would be one which would repeal the provision or amend
it. In this context and in advance of a potential referendum campaign, the aim
of this piece is to attempt to clarify the purpose and potential of this provision
with a view to recommending  the most appropriate approach for a vote on this
topic. First, it will be necessary to go back and investigate the origins and origi-
nal intent behind this seemingly unusual provision. Then the practical effect of
the provision, in terms of its impact on case law, will be analysed. Finally, poten-
tial reform proposals will be considered.

                        The  Origins of Article 41.2
Drafts of the Constitution
Many  writers have mused about the potential original intent of Article 41.2 and
the reasons for its inclusion in the Constitution in the first place. The provision
had no equivalent in the earlier Constitution and was one of the new additions
inserted in 1936. The first trace of this provision appears in the very simple
form of'protection of maternity'in John Hearne's Draft Heads of a Constitution,
drawn  up in October 1936. Article 62 of this early draft reads as follows:

     The Family
     1. Guarantee of the constitution and protection of the family as the basis of moral
        education and social discipline.
     2. Protection of marriage.
     3. Prohibition against attacks on purity, health and sacredness of family life.
     4. Protection of maternity.'


*   Lecturer in Law, School of Law, University of Limerick.
1.  UCD Archives: P150/2373.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most