About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

30 De Jure 227 (1997)
Teaching Intellectual Property Law in English-Speaking Africa: Current Status and Future Prospects and Trends

handle is hein.journals/dejur30 and id is 235 raw text is: 




Teaching intellectual property law in

English-speaking Africa: Current status and

future prospects and trends'

Tana Pistorius
BA LLM
Senior Lecturer in Mercantile Law, University of South Africa

Coenraad Visser
BCom LLM
Professor of Mercantile Law, University of South Africa

                               OPSOMMING
 Die Onderrig van Intellektueelgoederereg in Engelssprekende Afrika:
     Die Huidige Posisie en Toekomstige Vooruitsigte en Tendense
  Tot betreklik onlangs was intellektueelgoedereg redelik afgeskeep deur univer-
  siteite in Engelssprekende Afrika. Daar was hoofsaaklik drie redes vir hierdie
  toestand. Eerstens was daar vroe~r weerstand teen die doseer van wettereg op
  universiteitsvlak. Tweedens het die tegniese aard van hierdie veld aanleiding
  gegee tot die beskouing dat hierdie vakgebied nie veel studente sal trek nie.
  Derdens was daar die probleem om behoorlik gekwalifiseerde dosente te vind.
  Die posisie het onlangs beduidend verander. Daar is drie redes vir hierdie ver-
  andering: die vinnige pas van tegnologiese verandering en vernuwing, die ver-
  vaging van landsgrense, en die harmonisering van hierdie vakgebied op inter-
  nasionale vlak. In die slotgedeelte van hierdie artikel word sekere tendense in
  die doseer van hierdie vakgebied en navorsing daaroor bespreek.


  1 Introduction
Until fairly recently, the teaching of intellectual property law has been
rather neglected at most universities in English-speaking African countries.
This situation was by no means unique to these developing countries:
even in English-speaking industrialized countries, such as Canada, the
United Kingdom, and the United States,2 intellectual property law was not
taught at any level at most universities. And where it was taught, it was
not regarded as one of the so-called core courses in the legal curriculum.
Instead, it was usually relegated to the status of an elective course with a
small number of students.


  I This article is based on a paper delivered by Tana Pistorius at the WIPO Afro-Arab
    Regional Seminar on Teaching of Intellectual Property Law, organized by the World In-
    tellectual Property Organization in co-operation with the Government of the Arab Re-
    public of Egypt, Cairo, 9-11 December 1996, and a paper delivered by Coenraad
    Visser at the WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property Teaching and Research,
    and Drafting Patent Claims and Specifications, organized by the World Intellectual
    Property Organization in co-operation with the Government of Uganda, Kampala, 29 to
    30 October 1996.
  2 For a study of the position in these countries, see Naban The Teaching of Copyright in
    Countries with a Common-Law Tradition 1988 Copyright Bulletin 49.


227

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most