About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

3 Const. Ct. Rev. 111 (2010)
Substantive Reasoning in Administrative-Law Adjudication

handle is hein.journals/conrev3 and id is 111 raw text is: 






                               SUBSTANTIVE REASONING IN
                    ADMINISTRATIVE-LAW ADJUDICATION





                                                       Geo  Quinot*






1      Introduction

One  of the main  characteristics of constitutional transformation in
South  Africa is what  Etienne  Mureinik called  the shift towards  a
culture of justification, in which 'every exercise of power is expected
to be justified'.' He argued that within such a culture, constitutional
rights 'are standards  of justification - standards against which  to
measure  the justification of the decisions challenged under them'.2

    The notion of justification as central to constitutional democracy
in South Africa has been developed  further by a number  of scholars.
Alfred Cockrell was one of the first to assess the 'value-based nature
of  constitutional adjudication'  emerging  from  the  Constitutional
Court's early jurisprudence.3 Cockrell's basic argument  is that 'the
explicit intrusion  of constitutional values  into  the  adjudicative
process  signals a transition from  a  formal  vision of  law to  a
substantive vision of law in South Africa' in terms of which judges
are  'required to engage  with substantive  reasons in the form  of
moral  and political values' as opposed to the  'formal reasons' that
characterised  pre-constitutional adjudication.4 Subsequently,  in his



*   Professor, Department of Public Law, Stellenbosch University. My thanks to Megan
    Alberts for research assistance and to Sandra Liebenberg, Petrus Maree, Jackie
    Dugard and the CCR's anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on aspects of
    the paper.
    E Mureinik 'A bridge to where? Introducing the Interim Bill of Rights' (1994) 10
    South African Journal on Human Rights 31 32.
2   Mureinik (n 1 above) 33.
    A Cockrell 'Rainbow jurisprudence' (1996) 12 South African Journal on Human
    Rights 1 3.
4   n 3 above, 3, drawing on PS Atiyah Et RS Summers Form and substance in Anglo-
    American law: A comparative study of legal reasoning, legal theory, and legal
    institutions (1987).


111

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most