About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

105 Cornell L. Rev. Online 81 (2020)
The Nature of Reasonableness

handle is hein.journals/clro105 and id is 81 raw text is: 









                             ESSAY


       THE NATURE OF REASONABLENESS


                          Alan Calnant


         Though the notion of reasonableness dominates Anglo-
    American law, its meaning has been clouded by traditional
    conceptual analysis. This Essay argues that greater clarity
    can be gained by taking a scientific approach to the subject,
    exposing the natural foundations beneath the concept's
    varied interpretations.

                          INTRODUCTION
    Reasonable legal minds agree that reasonableness is one
of the foundational concepts of American law, infiltrating
everything from administrative, corporate, and constitutional
law  to crimes, torts, and      contracts.'    Yet the concept's
importance and prevalence have not necessarily bred clarity.
In fact, a recent flurry of analytic interpretations has only
clouded the term's meaning.2          While some scholars say
reasonableness is a prescriptive standard,3 others believe it
describes existing community values,4 and still others see it as
a  combination    of the two.5      This split is deepened      by



   t Professor of Law, Southwestern Law School. Many of the ideas in this
Essay were inspired by the groundbreaking work of neuroscientist Antonio
Damasio, though any unreasonable interpretations or applications remain mine
alone. On the back end, the Essay was greatly enhanced by the diligence and
professionalism of the Cornell Law Review Online.
   1 See Brandon L. Garrett, Constitutional Reasonableness, 102 MINN. L. REV.
61, 69-70 (2017) (recounting the concept's significance and use within multiple
legal fields); Fr~d&ric G. Sourgens, Reason and Reasonableness: The Necessary
Diversity of the Common Law, 67 ME. L. REV. 73, 74-75 (2014) (same).
   2 The latest entry appeared just last year in the Yale Law Journal Forum.
See Alan Z. Rozenshtein, Fourth Amendment Reasonableness After Carpenter,
128 YALE L.J.F. 943 (2019).
   3 See Alan D. Miller & Ronen Perry, The Reasonable Person, 87 N.Y.U. L.
REV. 323, 326 (2012) (We put forward and defend the argument that normative
definitions [of reasonableness] are categorically preferable to positive definitions
because the latter are logically unacceptable.).
   4 See Kevin P. Tobia, How People Judge What is Reasonable, 70 ALA. L. REV.
293, 299-300 (2018) (describing this view of reasonableness as a search for the
statistically average characteristics of people within a community).
   5 See id. at 296 (arguing that [r]easonableness is best understood as a

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most