About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

50 Cornell Int'l L.J. 107 (2017)
Between Convictions and Reconciliations: Processing Criminal Cases in Kazakhstani Courts

handle is hein.journals/cintl50 and id is 115 raw text is: Between Convictions and Reconciliations: Processing Criminal Cases in Kazakhstani Courts Alexei Trochevt The criminal justice system in Kazakhstan is full of contradictions: Soviet-era accusatorial bias in pre-trial detention and sentencing goes hand in hand with the pro-defendant bias in closing criminal cases. This paradoxical co-existence of seemingly contradictory biases fits well within the informal power map of the criminal justice system. The major reform-reducing prison population to decrease recidivism and minimize international shaming-was coupled with the more recent drives for closing cases on the basis of reconciliation, the total registration of crimes, and zero tolerance approach to combating crime have been achieved only through the change of the incentive structure in the criminal justice system. The post-Soviet innovation of closing criminal cases of public prosecution based on the reconciliation with the victim of crime has proliferated in Kazakhstan because this matched both the incentives of the key actors in the criminal justice system and demands from private actors who are involved in criminal proceedings. In contrast, other types of public participation, such as jury trials, which implement the right to a fair trial, give teeth to adversarial proceedings, and cultivate judicial independence-requirements of the Constitution of Kazakhstan-have rarely been used because they disrupt existing power relationships within the law-enforcement system. Introd u ction ..................................................................................... 108 I. Mapping the Criminal Justice System in Kazakhstan: Legacies, Incentives, Practices, and Outputs ..................... 110 II. Wholesale Approval of Pre-Trial Detention: A Remarkable C on tin u ity ............................................................................. 115 III. Avoiding Exoneration and Acquittals as in the Soviet P erio d .................................................................................... 12 2 IV. Closing Cases Based on Reconciliation between the Victim and the Accused-A Dramatic Expansion ......................... 135 f Dr. Alexei Trochev is an Associate Professor of Political Science and International Relations in the School of Humanities and Social Sciences at Nazarbayev University in Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan. I am grateful to Peter Solomon, Vadim Volkov, Mikhail Pozdnyakov, Ed Schatz, Mikhail Zherebtsov, and Sergey Pen for feedback and suggestions, and to Cornell Law School for hosting the 2016 Cornell International Law Journal Symposium with Nazarbayev University entitled The Rule of Law in Central Asia. The opinions expressed in this Article are the author's and do not represent the opinions of Nazarbayev University. 50 CORNELL INT'L L.J. 107 (2017)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most