About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

22 Child & Fam. L. Q. 46 (2010)
Clashing Symbols - Reconciling Support for Fathers and Fatherless Families after the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008

handle is hein.journals/chilflq22 and id is 48 raw text is: 46 Clashing symbols? Reconciling support for fathers and fatherless families after the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 Leanne Smith* The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 extends the attribution of legal parenthood following assisted reproduction to encompass a wider range of same-sex and fatherless families. The Act sparked a lengthy political debate rooted in widespread concern that its provisions will symbolically undermine fatherhood. This article examines the origins and legitimacy of concerns that support for fatherless (specifically lesbian) families presents a threat to the valuation of fatherhood. It suggests that such a view is false and underpinned by fundamental confusion over the separate significance of genetic and social parenthood which remains evident in family law and policy notwithstanding the recent reforms. The article presents the view that further steps to increase the recognition of genetic parents as well as social parents might encourage a shift from the gendered politics which polarises support for fathers and fatherless families. INTRODUCTION H ow to respond to the fragmentation of parenthood in situations where a child's genetic parents are not also the parents bringing up that child - in other words, the 'social parents' - is a key contemporary issue in family law.' The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFE Act 2008) alters significantly the attribution of legal parenthood following assisted reproduction, extending the range of situations in which the biological and social components of parenthood can be legally separated. By taking steps which facilitate the establishment of fatherless (and motherless) parenting arrangements, the new Act's parenthood provisions shun the traditional, heterosexual family model that was shored up by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. In that sense, they signify a radical step forward in terms of who the law is prepared to recognise as a parent and on what basis. However, during its journey through Parliament, the Act provoked a prolific backlash of responses in which the primacy of the heterosexual family was reasserted. These responses were targeted in particular at section 14(2)(b) which substitutes the reference to the child's need for a father, previously contained in section 13(5) of the 1990 Act, with a reference to the need for supportive parenting. Those who opposed this section frequently pitted the interests of fathers and the interests of fatherless Lecturer in Law, Cardiff Law School. The 'fragmentation' of traditionally based parent/child relationships has been extensively documented. See, for example, C. Smart and B. Neale, Family Fragments (Polity Press, 1999) and R. Collier and S. Sheldon, Fragmenting Fatherhood: A Socio-Legal Study (Hart Publishing, 2008).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most