About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

23 Cardozo L. Rev. 809 (2001-2002)
Human Judges of Truth, Deception, and Credibility: Confident but Erroneous

handle is hein.journals/cdozo23 and id is 831 raw text is: HUMAN JUDGES OF TRUTH, DECEPTION,
AND CREDIBILITY: CONFIDENT BUT
ERRONEOUS*
Saul M. Kassin**
I want to talk about the notion that people are good judges of
truth and deception-that we are, in fact, human lie detectors.
This is a particularly enlightened group, so I've heard a lot of
cautionary statements to that effect this morning that you
ordinarily don't hear from people. What I want to do is talk about
some psychology research data. Specifically, I want to use Ellen
Yaroshefsky's Fordham Law Review Article and her finding as a
starting point. Her finding-and I'll pull out the quote-is that
many prosecutors believe that evaluating credibility is a matter of
common sense.2 Well, I want to attack that notion in two ways.
First, I want to ask the question, what exactly is common
sense-and does it work? Social psychologists have been asking
these empirical questions for years. Dozens of studies have been
conducted    and   statistically  analyzed.    When    the studies are
combined, a compelling pattern emerges-that, as a general rule,
people are poor human lie detectors.3 How do we know?
* This transcript is an edited version of a presentation given by Professor Kassin at the
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law Symposium, The Cooperating Witness Conundrum:
Is Justice Obtainable? (Nov. 30, 2000).
** Saul M. Kassin is Professor of Psychology at Williams College. He received his
Ph.D. in 1978 from the University of Connecticut. In 1984, he was awarded a U.S.
Supreme Court Judicial Fellowship and spent the year at the Federal Judicial Center. In
1985 he was a postdoctoral fellow in the Psychology and Law Program at Stanford
University. Dr. Kassin is author of the textbooks PSYCHOLOGY (3d ed., Prentice Hall
2001) and SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (5th ed., Houghton Mifflin 2002), and has coauthored
several scholarly books, including: CONFESSIONS IN THE COURTROOM (1993), THE
PSYCHOLOGY OF EVIDENCE AND TRIAL PROCEDURE (1985), and THE AMERICAN JURY
ON TRIAL: PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES (1988). Dr. Kassin has published research
articles on interviewing, interrogation, and the elicitation of confessions by police--and on
the impact of this and other types of evidence on jury decision-making. He has served on
the editorial board of Law and Human Behavior since 1986 and has worked as a
consultant and expert witness in federal, military, and state courts.
I Ellen Yaroshefsky, Cooperation with Federal Prosecutors: Experiences of Truth
Telling and Embellishment, 68 FORDHAM L. REV. 917 (1999).
2 Id. at 943.
3 Bella M. DePaulo et al., The Accuracy-Confidence Correlation in the Detection of
Deception, 1 PERSONALITY & SOC. PSYCHOL. REV. 346 (1997).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most