About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

38 Can. Tax J. 913 (1990)
Equalization: The Representative Tax System Revisited

handle is hein.journals/cdntj38 and id is 919 raw text is: 








Equalization: The Representative Tax
System Revisited

                                  Richard M. Bird and Enid Slack*

PRECIS
Parmi les accords fiscaux entre le gouvernement f6dbral et les
provinces du Canada, le systbme de paiements de pdr6quation est un
des 616ments des mieux accept6s. Depuis 1967, les provinces
recoivent des paiements de transfert dont le montant est d6termin6
par leur capacit6 fiscale relative mesurde selon la m6thode du
regime fiscal repr6sentatif (RFR). Dans cet article nous d6crivons
I'6volution du syst6me RFR au cours des ann6es, et nous soulevons
des questions sur cette m6thode de mesurer la capacit6 fiscale. Ces
questions suggbrent que I'on devrait peut-6tre r6examiner la mithode
et mdme  le concept du RFR comme indice de la capacit6 fiscale, 6tant
donn6 son r6le central dans la d6termination du montant des
paiements de p6r6quation.

ABSTRACT
The system  of equalization grants is a well-accepted component of
federal-provincial fiscal arrangements in Canada. Since 1967, the
amount  of the equalization grants received by any province has been
determined by its relative fiscal capacity, as measured by the
representative tax system (RTS) approach. This article traces the
development  of the RTS system over time and raises questions about
that approach to measuring fiscal capacity. The questions suggest
that it is perhaps time to reconsider the conceptual basis and
mechanics  of the RTS measurement of fiscal capacity, which plays
such a central role in determining equalization payments.


INTRODUCTION
Equalization is a subject that arouses strong emotions in the hearts of those
few Canadians who have thought much about it. This article begins therefore
with a brief disclaimer.' First, it does not in any way consider the rationale
for equalization: for purposes of argument we just assume, like most Cana-

   * Department of Economics, University of Toronto and Enid Slack Consulting Inc.,
respectively.
   I We are grateful to the anonymous referee whose comments, although we did not agree
with them all, showed the need for this disclaimer.


July-August 1990/juillet-aoat 1990 913

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most