About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

15 CCLR 233 (2021)
Climate Justice under the Paris Agreement: Framework and Substance

handle is hein.journals/cclr2021 and id is 258 raw text is: CCLR 312021

Climate Justice Under the Paris Agreement:
Framework and Substance
Temitope Tunbi Onifade*
The Paris Agreement is the first treaty under the global climate regime to mention 'climate
justice' as a concept. Given this unprecedented legal turn of the concept, the article reports
a sociolegal study of climate justice, framing and assessing the substantive policy issues
arising from the post-Paris negotiations of the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the Unit-
ed Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Gleaned from these frame-
work and policy issues leading to the Glasgow COP in 2021, how does climate justice look
under the Paris Agreement? Drawing on the author's lived, legal practice and civil society
experience, carrying out a doctrinal analysis of the UNFCCC and its instruments, and re-
viewing pivotal and representative literature and policy documents, the article claims that
climate justice faces the fundamental challenge of state sovereignty. The author creates the
conceptual and policy framework to identify the substantive issues converging on this fun-
damental challenge, assessing four of them: state self-centredness in addressing adaptation,
state influence on the progress made on loss and damage, state autonomy and discretion in
providing finance, and state-based policy-making that undermines inclusive decision-mak-
ing. State and non-state actors are addressing these substantive issues already under the
UNFCCC and beyond, and litigation has become a cross-cutting remedy. However, the fun-
damental challenge of state sovereignty remains.

I. Introduction
Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention
on Climate Change (UNFCCC)          also loosely called
the global climate regime when referring to the entire
UNFCCC process as against the convention alone
have debated justice-related concepts and issues from
its beginnings. For instance, the convention, which
opened for signature in 1992 but entered into force in
1994, recognizes the principles of 'equity' and 'com-
mon but differentiated responsibilities and respective
DOI: 10.21552/cclr/2021/3/6
Vanier Scholar, Peter A. Allard School of Law, Co-chair, Liu
Institute Network for Africa, School of Public Policy and Global
Affairs, and Expert for Climate Law, Policy and Justice, Climate
Teaching Connector, UBC. The author has presented previous
drafts of the manuscript and received feedback from the Acade-
mic Council of the United Nations System Annual Meeting in
June 2021, the UBC Climate Justice Webinar Series in March
2021, the UBC Climate Emergency Virtual Dialogue- Climate
Justice in June 2020, and the UBC Liu Institute Network for
Africa Symposium in October 2019. Thanks to Ruth Angela
Situma, Linda Nowlan and Andjelka Mihajlov for reading and
commenting on the drafts. Many thanks to the anonymous
referees for thoughtful comments and Jakob McKernan for han-

capabilities' under Article 3, and parties took account
of 'common but differentiated responsibilities' in their
policy negotiations at the first Conference of the Par-
ties (COP) at Berlin, Germany, in 1995.1 Numerous
stakeholders and scholars have also debated these and
other justice-related concepts and issues applicable to
the global climate regime, including justice, environ-
mental justice, distributive justice, global justice, and
anticapitalism. For instance, Shue made a seminal con-
tribution examining differential emissions2 and oth-
er issues under the regime, using justice as his lens.3
dling the manuscript. The research would not be possible with-
out the Vanier Scholarship from the Government of Canada and
the International Doctoral Fellowship and other grants from the
University of British Columbia. For correspondence: <temi-
tope@onifade.org>.
1   Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its First Session, held at
Berlin from 28 March to 7 April 1995 <copl 07 (unfccc.int)>.
2   Henry Shue, 'Subsistence Emissions and Luxury Emissions' (1993)
15 Law and Policy 39; Henry Shue, Climate Justice: Vulnerability
and Protection (Oxford University Press 2014).
3   Henry Shue, 'The Unavoidability of Justice' in Andrew Hurrell
and Benedict Kingsbury (eds), The International Politics of the
Environment (Oxford University Press 1992).

S233

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most