About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

23 Cato J. 403 (2003-2004)
Measuring Bad Governance

handle is hein.journals/catoj23 and id is 413 raw text is: MEASURING BAD GOVERNANCE
Evan Osborne
One of the most compelling features of postwar economic history
is the continued prevalence of global poverty. Its intransigence is
striking given the fact that development has been one of the main
items on the international agenda since the end of World War II. The
United Nations has numerous branches devoted entirely to reducing
poverty, and both the World Bank and the International Monetary
Fund have spent billions of dollars to promote development. Many
wealthy nations also have government departments devoted to devel-
opment assistance, and the amount of cash and in-kind transfers these
countries have disbursed over the years is substantial.
After over half a century of such efforts, success has been scattered
and slow, especially given the optimism that was so prevalent in the
1950s. If a dollar a day or less in income is used as the standard of
poverty, the United Nations (2002) reports that the percentage of
poor people in all developing countries fell between 1987 and 1999
from 28 to 24 percent, but very unevenly. A recent estimate suggested
that almost half the world's population lives on less than two dollars
a day (Duraippah 2000), and progress has varied tremendously by
region. East Asia, particularly China, has showed dramatic progress,
and India has advanced modestly since the early 1990s. But much of
Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa has shown very little improve-
ment. In addition, many nations that were once thought to be poten-
tial stars of development, such as Argentina and Brazil, have struggled
mightily during most of the postwar period, even as other nations
such as Singapore, Mauritius, and Chile have had unexpected success.
What might account for this pattern of long-term, widespread fail-
ure combined with isolated but dramatic success? While the 1990s
saw the emergence of the Washington consensus, the belief that
Cato Journal, Vol. 23, No. 3 (Winter 2004). Copyright 0 Cato Institute. All rights
reserved.
Evan Osborne is Associate Professor of Economics at Wright State University. He gratefully
acknowledges the support of the Institute for Social and Economic Research at Osaka Uni-
versity, where much of the research for this study was completed.

403

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most