About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

21 Bus. Law. 337 (1965-1966)
Professionalism and the Stockbroker

handle is hein.journals/busl21 and id is 341 raw text is: January 1966                                                       337
PROFESSIONALISM AND THE STOCKBROKER*
Some Observations on the SEC Special Study
by
EZRA G. LEVIN** and WILLIAM M. EVAN***
New York City            Cambridge, Mass.
The complexities of modern industrial society have rendered in-
creasingly more difficult the task of the lawyer in adjudicating actual
or potential conflicts and in articulating the guidelines for their
orderly resolution. The securities industry is an exemplar of these
complexities, which are abundantly documented in the Report of
Special Study of Securities Markets of the Securities and Exchange
Commission'-referred to hereinafter as the Special Study. The in-
dustry may be viewed as a social system with a complex structure of
individual interrelationships, a complex network of interacting organ-
izations, and a complex system of rules (legal norms) derived from
common law, statutory law, administrative regulations and private
legal systems.2
The point of departure of this paper is an assumption that, in ad-
dition to the standard legal methods of analysis, the methods and con-
cepts of the social sciences, especially sociology, may be helpful in
illuminating complex legal and social phenomena.3 The observations
which follow have been prompted by some aspects of the Special Study.
To some sophisticated securities lawyers, these observations may seem
to belabor of the obvious, albeit in unfamiliar terms. Yet the
sources even of recurrent problems in the securities industry are not
all readily recognizable, and guidelines for their resolution are by no
means entirely obvious, either. If the application of different concepts
*Revised from a paper read at the annual meeting of the American Sociolog-
ical Association at Los Angeles, California, August, 1963.
**Member of the New York Bar.
***Associate Professor of Sociology and Management, Sloan School of
Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
1. H. R. Doc. No. 95, 88th Congress, 1st Session, Pts. 1-5 (1963).
2. Cf. Evan, Public and Private Legal Systems, in LAW AND SOCIOLOGY
165-184 (Evan. ed. 1962).
3. For a somewhat contrary view as to the feasibility of fruitful research
in the sociology of law, cf. Riesman, Law and Sociology: Recruitments, Train-
ing and Colleagueship, in LAW AND SOCIOLOGY 14 (Evan ed. 1962) : ... soci-
ology is not now prepared to embrace the legal order within its own categories
in terms sufficiently detailed and concrete to shed new illumination. There is
not only a certain intellectual impenetrability about the law, reflecting and
resulting from the achievements of generations of jurists; there is an even
more important factual impenetrability resulting from the sheer overwhelming
and opaque bulk of data that must be mastered to link the empirical with
the interpretive or the ideal-typical. Riesman concludes that at present only
an occupational approach is feasible in the sociology of law, by which he means
a sociological study of lawyers and, by implication, of other personnel of the
legal system. Cf. discussion note 69 infra and accompanying text.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most