About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

28 Berkeley La Raza L.J. 118 (2018)
Immigration Law's Due Process Deficit and the Persistence of Plenary Power

handle is hein.journals/berklarlj28 and id is 118 raw text is: IMMIGRATION LAW'S DUE PROCESS DEFICIT AND THE PERSISTENCE OF PLENARY POWER CARRIE ROSENBAUM* INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 119 I. Detention of Asylum Seekers ............................................120 II. Substantive Due Process Rights of Noncitizens ................................125 A. Zadvydas v. Davis and Clark v. Martinez..........................126 1. Zadvydas v. Davis .................................... 126 2. Clark v. Martinez ............................... ...... 128 B. Rodriguez-Fernandez v. Wilkinson ............... ............129 C. Demore v. Kim .......................................... 130 D. Jennings v. Rodriguez ........................................132 III. R.I.L-R-Substantive Due Process Asylum Seekers-Immigration Detention Cannot Be Punishment .......................................138 IV. Non-Immigration Civil and Criminal Preventive Detention ........ .......141 V. The Plenary Power Doctrine and Systemic Racial Bias-Asylum Seekers in Detention .................................. ................ 143 A. Immigration Law and History of Mistreatment of Central American and Mexican Immigrants.. .................................143 B. The Plenary Power Doctrine's Role in Immigration Racial Classifications ...................................... ..... 151 VI. Mainstreaming Constitutional Procedural Due Process - Disaggregation and Rule of Law ................................................ 152 A. Rule of Law and Disaggregating Immigration Law Along Criminal Immigration Lines ............................... .........153 CONCLUSION ............................................... .... 156 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38HQ3RZ6W * Adjunct Professor, Golden Gate University School of Law. Special thanks to the following colleagues and friends for their support, ideas, and comments at various stages of this Article: Marisa Cianciarulo, Emily Torstveit Ngara, Richard Boswell, Caitlin Barry, David Baluarte, Jennifer Chac6n, C6sar Cuauht6moc Garcia HernAndez, Kari Hong, Kevin Johnson, Anil Kalhan, Jennifer Koh, Christopher Lasch, Mark Noferi, Philip Torrey, and Yolanda VAzquez. I am also grateful do the NYU School of Law Clinical Writer's Workshop for allowing me to present this Article and receive meaningful feedback. Thanks as well to Courtney Brown for stellar editorial assistance, and Pedro Viramontes, and the editorial board of Berkeley La Raza Law Journal. And as I celebrate my fourth published law review article, I owe special gratitude to my spouse, daughter, and mother for their continued support of my scholarly endeavors. All errors are my own. This article is dedicated to the brave people who have made the incredibly hard decision to flee their homes to come here, and three of the devoted advocates who inspire me endlessly by fighting for them, and incarcerated people more broadly - Holly Cooper, Marty Rosenbluth, and Millard Murphy.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most