About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

56 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1579 (2019)
Is Mass Incarceration Inevitable

handle is hein.journals/amcrimlr56 and id is 1600 raw text is: IS MASS INCARCERATION INEVITABLE? Andrew D. Leipold* ABSTRACT The claim that American justice system engages in mass incarceration is now a cliche, albeit one that seems entirely justified by both the number and rate of people who are behind bars. As a result, a large number of states and the fed- eral government have engaged in wide-ranging reform efforts to shorten senten- ces, divert people from prison, and in general reduce incarceration numbers to more manageable levels. Although these efforts have made modest gains, there has been little discussion of whether their ultimate goal is feasible-reducing incarceration levels to a point where mass incarceration is no longer an apt description. This article explores the likelihood of a meaningful, sustained reduction in incarceration rates. It begins by asking what we really mean by mass incarcera- tion and finds that while the definition is surprisingly complex, the label ulti- mately seems justified. Then, using existing and original compilations of data, the article examines some of the less-obvious obstacles to reducing prison popula- tions. In particular, it highlights the difficulty of reducing incarceration rates without addressing the problems created by those convicted of violent crimes, something few reforms have been willing or able to do. It also argues that those who believe prison reform will lead to economic savings-a primary motivation in virtually every state-are misguided, and that illusion of economic savings might ultimately derail the reform efforts. The article then takes a further step and suggests that efforts to decrease incarceration levels will inevitably be frustrated unless the most influential per- son in the creation of mass incarceration, the prosecutor, is induced to play a more central role. To date, reform efforts have routinely targeted everyone in the process except prosecutors, and this article offers both suggestions on why this is so and an argument for why prosecutors are an indispensable part of any change. The article concludes with the sobering prediction that, as useful as recent reforms have been, as currently constructed they will ultimately be inad- equate to erase the mass incarceration label for years to come. * Edwin M. Adams Professor, University of Illinois College of Law. My thanks to Eric Johnson, Patrick Keenan, and the members of the Illinois College of Law faculty workshop for their many helpful comments on earlier drafts. My thanks also to Douglas Malcolm for his invaluable research assistance. Oc 2019, Andrew D. Leipold. 1579

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most