67 Alb. L. Rev. 793 (2003-2004)
Examining the Decline in Support for Merit Selection in the States

handle is hein.journals/albany67 and id is 807 raw text is: EXAMINING THE DECLINE IN SUPPORT FOR MERIT
SELECTION IN THE STATES
Seth Andersen*
Popular support for constitutional change from judicial elections
to merit selection systems has declined significantly over the past
three decades.1 The last state to adopt a merit selection system by
constitutional amendment was New Mexico in 1988, and that was a
compromise measure that retained contested partisan elections
following initial appointment.2 Between 1940 and 1988, fifteen
states   adopted    constitutional amendments         to   replace   judicial
elections with some type of merit-selection system for some or all
levels of courts.3 Of these fifteen states, five completely abolished
contested judicial elections; the remaining ten kept contested
elections for some or all of their trial court judgeships. The 1960s
and 1970s were the real heyday of merit selection, with twelve of
the fifteen constitutional amendments occurring between 1960 and
1977.4    Five   other   state  constitutions include      merit selection
provisions, but     all of these      states   had   existing   systems    of
* Project Manager, Standing Committee on Judicial Independence, American Bar
Association. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, and do not
necessarily reflect the official positions or policies of the American Bar Association.
For the purposes of this article, the term merit selection is used to refer to appointive
state judicial selection systems in which a nominating commission screens applicants and
provides a short list of names to the appointing authority, usually the governor, who makes
the final appointment. Under this definition, merit selection systems may or may not include
such features as uncontested retention elections to secure additional terms, legislative
confirmation of appointees, or reappointment and reconfirmation of judges for additional
terms.
2 See Anthony Champagne, The Politics of Judicial Selection, 31 POLW STUD. J. 413, 413
(2003).
3 See AMERICAN JUDICATURE SOCIETY, JUDICIAL MERIT SELECTION: CURRENT STATUS Table
1 (2003), available at http://www.ajs.org/selection/sel-stateselect.asp (last visited Mar. 29,
2004) (listing the dates of adoption of constitutional merit selection provisions). The fifteen
states that adopted constitutional amendments for merit selection of some or all state judges
between 1940 and 1988 were, in order of adoption: Missouri (1940), Indiana (1960), Iowa
(1962), Nebraska (1962), Colorado (1967), Oklahoma (1967), Utah (1967), Tennessee (1971),
Florida (1972), Kansas (1972), Wyoming (1973), Arizona (1974), New York (1977), South
Dakota (1980), and New Mexico (1988). Id.
4 See id.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing nearly 2,700 academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline with pricing starting as low as $29.95

Access to this content requires a subscription. Please visit the following page to request a quote or trial:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?