17 Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 349 (2000)
Failed Efforts to Initiate the Millenium Round in Seattle: Lessons for Future Global Trade Negotiations

handle is hein.journals/ajicl17 and id is 363 raw text is: FAILED EFFORTS TO INITIATE THE MILLENNIUM ROUND IN
SEATTLE: LESSONS FOR FUTURE GLOBAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS
David A. Gantz*
Suspension'--Setback--Disappointment-Disaster-Debacle-are
only a few of the terms used by various World Trade Organization (WTO)
members, the press and the public to describe the failure of the members of the
WTO to initiate a new Millennium Round of global trade liberalization
negotiations.' Regardless of the term used to describe what happened in Seattle
from November 29-December 3, 1999, the experience raises at least three
significant questions addressed by this essay: First, what went wrong? Second,
what happens next with regard to further global trade negotiations in the more or
less continuing post World War II process toward freer trade? Finally, what is the
probable impact of Seattle on Chinese accession to the WTO (as it becomes
increasingly clear that the two are related, at least in the United States)? The full
implications of Seattle will be revealed only over time. As of April 2000 it is
already obvious that the implications are substantial, fundamentally changing the
operations of the WTO and the nature of any future negotiations that will facilitate
the expansion of world trade.
In considering these questions one should keep in mind that obtaining the
agreement of the members of the international community on freer trade-on
market opening measures-has always been a difficult process, and that other
global trade negotiation rounds under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
(GATT) have been delayed and/or limited in success. (The previous Uruguay
Round negotiations were effectively suspended in 1990 and again in 1992, but
ultimately produced agreement in 1993, more than three years after the intended
completion date. 2)
WTO data indicates that as a partial result of trade liberalization over the
past fifty years, exports worldwide account for over twenty-five percent of world-
wide Gross Domestic Product (GDP), compared with only eight percent in 1950.
*     Professor and Director of Graduate Studies in Law, the University of Arizona,
James E. Rogers College of Law; Associate Director, National Law Center for Inter-
American Free Trade. This is a revised and expanded version of a paper that was prepared
December 5, 1999, and presented to various university and business groups in Korea,
December 6-10, 1999. The author is grateful to the U.S. Information Agency and the U.S.
Department of State for the opportunity to discuss these issues in Korea.
I.    See, itter alia, Robert G. Kaiser & John Burgess, Fruitless in Seattle, WASH.
POST NAT'L WKLY ED., Dec. 20-27, 1999, at 20-21.
2.    See Charlene Barshefsky & Michael Moore, Joint Press Conference (visited
Jan. 5, 2000) <http://www.usia.gov/vto/ppl203b.htm>.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing nearly 2,700 academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline with pricing starting as low as $29.95

Access to this content requires a subscription. Please visit the following page to request a quote or trial:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?