About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

31 Prob. & Prop. 55 (2017)
Legal Writing: Legalese, Please

handle is hein.journals/probpro31 and id is 397 raw text is: 







































By Martin A. Schwartz


Most real estate lawyers are
         articulate in oral conversa-
         tion and able to clearly and
succinctly express a particular posi-
tion or thought. And some may even
be good novelists.
   But when it comes to drafting
legal documents, the rule seems to be
legalese, please! Legalese is a com-
monly  used style of drafting legal
documents  that consists of torturing
the English language for the alleged
purpose of clarity and precision but
which often results in the opposite.
   Merriam-Webster's Learner's Dic-
tionary defines legalese as follows:
the language used by lawyers that
is difficult for most people to under-
stand; legal jargon. It is a language

Martin A. Schwartz is a partner in Bilzin
Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP in
Miami, Florida.


that relies on the use of archaic terms,
poor grammar  and sentence struc-
ture, and needless repetition. One
commentator  has described it some-
what differently: Legalese-lawyers'
jargon-is turgid and annoying, adds
nothing of substance, gives a false
sense of precision, and obscures gaps
in analysis. Gerald Lebovits, On
Terra Firma with English, Scribes J. of
Legal Writing 2014-15, at 123.
   Fortunately, we seem to have
moved  away  from the identification
of the parties to an agreement as the
party of the first part and the party
of the second part. This cloak of ano-
nymity made  it virtually impossible
to identify which party was respon-
sible for which obligations. And it
was deservedly parodied in the Marx
Brothers movie A Night at the Opera.
   But most other legalese lives on.
Typical legal agreements begin with


a preliminary statement referred to
as Witnesseth, continue with sev-
eral Whereas clauses, and conclude
with In Witness Whereof. Affida-
vits frequently conclude with the
statement: Further Affiant Sayeth
Naught. One  would be hard pressed
to find these archaic terms used in
other styles of writing, but they do
bear the imprimatur of making a doc-
ument  look legal to the same extent
as in the age of Robin Hood. Out-
side of the legal profession, would
words like Witnesseth pass a com-
puter spell check? Does it add clarity
to express some 21st-century concepts
using 15th-century language?
   Adding to the legalness of a
document  are the inclusion of the
h words: herein, hereof, hereto,
hereunder, and hereinafter. These
words, other than hereinafter, defy
precision, because it is never clear


PROBATE &  PROPERTY  NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2017

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most