About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

30 Yale J. Int'l L. 211 (2005)
Human Rights Law Meets Private Law Harmonization: The Coming Conflict

handle is hein.journals/yjil30 and id is 217 raw text is: Human Rights Law Meets
Private Law Harmonization:
The Coming Conflict
Paul R. Dubinskyt
I.     IN TRO DU CTION  ............................................................................................................................ 2 12
II.    PRIVATE LAW HARMONIZATION IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY ................................................... 218
A.     The Origins and Ideologies of Modern Private Law Harmonization ............................. 219
1.     Scholars  and  Intellectuals ................................................................................... 219
2.     C om m ercial Interests  .......................................................................................... 221
3.     Political Integrationists  ...................................................................................... 221
4.     The  Cum ulative  Impact ....................................................................................... 223
B.     Harmonization  After  World  War 1I ................................................................................. 223
1.     H arm onization  Treaties  ...................................................................................... 224
2.     International Arbitration  .................................................................................... 225
3.     Regional Harmonization: The Brussels and Lugano Conventions ..................... 230
a.       Curtailing  Exorbitant Jurisdiction .......................................................... 232
b.        The  N atural F orum   ................................................................................. 235
c.       Minimizing Concurrent Jurisdiction and Maximizing Legal Certainty.. 237
C.     The Brussels Convention as Paradigm: More Recent Developments in the
Harm onization  of  Procedural Law  ................................................................................. 240
D.     The Brussels and Rome Conventions  in Practice ........................................................... 244
The  Case  of  the M igrant  Workers ................................................................................... 244
III.   THE HUMAN RIGHTS LAW MOVEMENT IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY ........................................ 247
A.     The Human Rights Movement and the Unification Movement: Early Similarities ........ 250
B.     The Early Human Rights Movement: Codification ......................................................... 251
C.     From Codifying Rights to Enforcing Rights: Second Generation Treaties .................... 253
1.     Expanding National Jurisdiction: The Hague and Montreal Conventions ........ 255
2.     Expanding National Jurisdiction: National Legislation and Case Law ............. 257
a.        The Rebirth of Power Theories of Jurisdiction: Jurisdiction Through
Physical Presence  ................................................................................... 258
b.       Jurisdiction Based on Passive Personality ............................................. 265
c.        Universal Jurisdiction ....................................... 268
IV.    JURISDICTION AND BEYOND: THE CONFLICT ILLUSTRATED IN HYPOTHETICAL CASES ............... 282
A.     Case 1: The Asset Trail: Recognizing and Enforcing Human Rights Judgments
W orldw ide  ....................................................................................................................... 282
B.     Case 2: Class Actions and Forum Non Conveniens ....................................................... 284
C.     Case 3: Statutes of Limitation and Retroactivity  ............................................................ 286
t     Associate Professor, New York Law School. I am grateful for thoughtful comments from
Jos6 Alvarez, Lenni Benson, Vivian Grosswald Curran, Stephen Ellmann, Denise Morgan, Mark Osiel,
Mathias Reimann, Ruti Teitel, and Don Zeigler; the research assistance of Marta Kiszely and Michael
McCarthy, and help from Silvy Singh. I also thank participants in the following workshops: Brooklyn
Law School (faculty workshop); Columbia Law School (international law workshop); the Human Rights
Workshop of the Orville H. Schell, Jr. Center for International Human Rights at Yale Law School;
Whittier Law School (faculty workshop); and the 2003 annual meeting of the American Society of
Comparative Law. From 1998 to 2003, the author participated in the efforts of the Hague Conference on
Private International Law to draft a global convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of foreign
judgments (see infra Part II.C), first as a member of the U.S. delegation and then as a representative of
Human Rights Watch and the International Association of Democratic Lawyers. Participation was made
possible by an International Affairs Fellowship from the Council on Foreign Relations. The views
expressed herein do not necessarily coincide with those of the Council on Foreign Relations.
Responsibility for any errors, of course, remains my own.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most