About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

95 Wash. L. Rev. 377 (2020)
The Trauma of Trump's Family Separation and Child Detention Actions: A Children's Rights Perspective

handle is hein.journals/washlr95 and id is 377 raw text is: 















THE TRAUMA OF TRUMP'S FAMILY SEPARATION
AND CHILD DETENTION ACTIONS: A CHILDREN'S
RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE


Jonathan Todres* & Daniela Villamizar Fink**


      Abstract: In April 2018, the Trump  Administration publicly announced a new zero-
   tolerance policy for illegal entries at the U.S. border. This action kicked off a wave of family
   separations that made headlines and drew criticism from around the globe. Despite resounding
   condemnation  of these actions, the Trump Administration defended its family separation
   policy as a tough deterrent. At least 2,600 families were torn apart in the ensuing months.
   And  subsequent reports-from both the government and others-have  detailed widespread
   abuses of and substandard conditions for children held in detention centers. The consequences
   of these separations and the maltreatment of children in detention are pronounced. The trauma
   that children have endured potentially has lifelong ramifications. This Article provides an in-
   depth, children's rights-based analysis of the Trump Administration's family separation and
   child detention policies and actions. A children's rights perspective offers several critical
   insights. First, children's rights are rooted in a legal mandate. Second, examining the Trump
   Administration's actions from a children's rights perspective reveals the breadth of rights
   violations occurring. This more nuanced understanding of the events can help in devising
   appropriate strategies to respond to such violations. Third, a children's rights perspective helps
   place the Trump Administration's actions in their historical context to better understand the
   gravity of these actions. Children's rights law is as close to universally accepted as any human
   rights law, and thus any departures from such widely embraced standards are particularly
   revealing. Finally, the authors discuss the implications of this children's rights assessment,
   urging action on several fronts to address this harm and prevent violations of children's rights
   in the future.











*  Jonathan Todres is Distinguished University Professor and Professor of Law at Georgia State
University College of Law. This Article benefited from feedback received at The Intersection of
Immigration Law and Health Policy symposium at Indiana University McKinney School of Law and
at the American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2019 Health Law Professors Conference in
Chicago, IL. Thank you to Seema Mohapatra and Nicolas Terry, whose invitation to present at the
Indiana University symposium gave us the initial impetus for this Article. We are grateful to Warren
Binford and Emily Torstveit Ngara for their helpful comments on earlier drafts, to Monica Laredo
Ruiz (GSU  College of Law, 2019) for her outstanding research assistance, and to Amanda Roy (GSU
College of Law, 2020) for her editorial assistance. Finally, our thanks to the Washington Law Review
editors and staff, and in particular to Jenny Aronson, Kylie Fisher, Kingsly McConnell, and Malori
McGill. They improved our Article and made the production process a pleasure. The research in this
Article covers events through October 2019.
*  Daniela Villamizar Fink is an attorney with Kuck Baxter Immigration, LLC, where she practices
immigration law.


377

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most