About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

71 Fla. L. Rev. 217 (2019)
What If Artificial Intelligence Wrote This: Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law

handle is hein.journals/uflr71 and id is 225 raw text is: 



      WHAT IF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WROTE THIS?
      ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND COPYRIGHT LAW

                         Victor M. Palacet *

                             Abstract
   The   increasing  sophistication and  proliferation of  artificial
intelligence has given rise to a provoking question in copyright law: Who
is the copyright owner of a work created by autonomous artificial
intelligence? In other words, when a machine learns, thinks, and acts
without human input, and it creates a work, what person should own the
copyright, if any? This Note explains why this is a pressing question and
why current laws and practices fail to address the issue. It then analyzes
the arguments for and against the possible choices: the artificial
intelligence, the user, the programmer, the company that owns the
artificial intelligence, and entrance into the public domain. Finally, this
Note arrives at the conclusion that the work's immediate entrance into
the public domain is the solution.

INTRODUCTION   ..................................................................................... 218

    I.  CONGRESS OR THE FEDERAL COURTS WILL SOON
        BE REQUIRED TO SAY WHO OWNS THE COPYRIGHT
        FOR WORKS MADE BY AUTONOMOUS ARTIFICIAL
        INTELLIGENCE  ........................................................................ 220
        A. The Sophistication ofArtificial Intelligence
             Will Continue to  Increase ............................................... 220
        B. Works Created by Artificial Intelligence Are
             E veryw here  ..................................................................... 222

    II. CURRENT COPYRIGHT LAWS FAIL TO ADDRESS THE
        QUESTION OF COPYRIGHT OWNERSHIP FOR WORKS
        MADE BY AUTONOMOUS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ............. 225
        A. Congress and the Federal Courts Have Yet
             to Address Autonomous Artificial Intelligence ............... 225
        B. The Copyright Office's Human Authorship
             Requirement Fails to Properly Address
             Autonomous Artificial Intelligence ................................. 226

     f Editor's Note: This Note won the Gertrude Brick Prize for the best Note in Spring 2018.
     * J.D., University of Florida Levin College of Law 2019; B.S. Electrical and Computer
Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder 2016. All my accomplishments are a result of
tremendous support from my friends and family, to whom I dedicate this Note. I am also grateful
to my Note advisor, Professor Hannibal Travis, for guiding me in writing this Note.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most