About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

16 Tul. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 117 (2007-2008)
The Customary International Law Duty to Prosecute Crimes against Humanity: A New Framework

handle is hein.journals/tulicl16 and id is 121 raw text is: The Customary International Law Duty To
Prosecute Crimes Against Humanity:
A New Framework
Miles M. Jackson*
Within its assumed analytical framework, contemporary scholarship cannot assert plausibly
that customary international law imposes a duty on states to prosecute crimes against humanity
Amnesties are necessarily inconsistent with a duty to prosecute, and the sheer glut of state practice
granting amnesties in times of crisis to perpetrators of these crimes is seen to prevent the duty to
prosecute from  arising  Although scholars recognize the normative shortcomings of tis
conclusion, this is the position the present analytical framework requires. A new framework alters
the outcome. This Article transplants the derogation provisions of international human rights law
into customary international law, retrospectively analyzing the six well-known amnesties. If the
amnesty in question was granted at a 'me ofpublic emergency as defined in the human rights
instruments, it should properly be seen as derogation from the putative duty to prosecute rather
than state practice contradicting the assertion of that duty This new analytical framework diverts
the bulk of state practice seen by scholars to be contrary to the duty to prosecute into a separate
category constituting an exception from that duty Combined with new evidence in support of the
duty it is now plausible to assert that customary international law imposes on states a duty to
prosecute crimes against humanity from which a small derogation exception is carved
I.    INTRODUCTION      ................................................................................. 118
II.   THE STATE OF THE LITERATURE AT PRESENT ................................... 121
A.     The Idealist Position ................................................................ 121
B.     The Realist Position ................................................................ 123
III. UPDATING THE IDEALIST POSITION .................................................. 126
A .   Introduction   ............................................................................. 126
B.    Aut Dedere Aut Judicare as a Customary Law Principle ..... 126
C     Decisions ofInternadonal and Nadonal Courts .................... 129
D      The R  om e  Statute  ................................................................... 131
E     CommandResponsibilit ....................................................... 132
IV    A NEW FRAMEWORK ........................................................................ 134
A .   Introducton    ............................................................................. 134
B.     The Thresholds ofDerogation ................................................ 135
C     Challenges to Derogation ....................................................... 137
V     THE NEW FRAMEWORK APPLIED ..................................................... 140
A .   Introduction   ............................................................................. 140
*     © 2007 Miles M. Jackson. LL.M. Harvard University. BA (Jurisprudence) Oxford
University. I would like to thank Professors Ryan Goodman and William Alford, Jane Bestor, and
the editors of the Tulane Journal oflnternational & Comparative Law. All errors remain my own.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most