About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

31 Nat'l L. Sch. India Rev. 72 (2019)
A Critique of the Aadhaar Legal Framework

handle is hein.journals/nlsind31 and id is 84 raw text is: 





            A  CRITIQUE OF THE AADHAAR

            LEGAL FRAMEWORK

            -Vrinda Bliandari and Renuka Sane*



         Abstract   This  paper critically examines  the legal frame-
         work consisting of the Aadhaar  Act, the Aadhaar  Ordinance,
         and the Aadhaar  Regulations from the perspective of account-
         ability, delegation, and  grievance  redressal  and  enforce-
         ment. The  paper finds that much  is delegated to the Unique
         Identification Authority of India ('UIDAI') without adequate
         checks and  balances. The  UIDAI   has  further delegated the
         setting of several standards and procedures to its future self,
         suggesting that the process is operating  in a legal vacuum.
         The  accountability framework  of  the UIDAI   remains  weak
         and beset with conflict of interest, as there are no statutorily
         mandated  accountability  standards. This  makes  the perfor-
         mance  of the UIDAI  difficult to measure. Regulations relating
         to grievance redressal and enforcement are also weak.




                           I. INTRODUCTION

   India, today, has  the  world's largest centralised database  of personally
identifiable biometric information. This  is due  to the  nation-wide issuance
of an Aadhaar   number  to all residents, after the collection of their biomet-
rics (including fingerprints, iris scans, and photograph) and demographic  data
(including address and  date of birth) since 2010. At current count, more than
1.2 billion Aadhaar numbers  have been issued.'

   The  genesis of the Aadhaar project was  with the view that biometric-based
authentication was  essential to eliminating  ghosts and  duplicate beneficiar-
ies that were a drag on  the public welfare system. The  Aadhaar  number   was

   Vrinda Bhandari is a practicing advocate in New Delhi and appeared on behalf of one of the
   Petitioners challenging the constitutionality of the Aadhaar Act and its Regulations. Renuka
   Sane is an associate professor at the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, New
   Delhi. We thank Gautam Bhatia, Anirudh Burman, Pratik Datta, Shubho Roy, and Bhargavi
   Zaveri for useful discussions. All views expressed are personal. We also thankful to the anon-
   ymous peer reviewer, whose feedback was very helpful. All errors are our own.
   Aadhaar in numbers https://uidai.gov.in/ (last visited January 16, 2019).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most