About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

54 Env't L. 221 (2024)
Just Look at the Map: Bounding Environmental Review of Housing Development in California

handle is hein.journals/envlnw54 and id is 237 raw text is: 








           JUST LOOK AT THE MAP: BOUNDING
         ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OF HOUSING
               DEVELOPMENT IN CALIFORNIA

                                  BY
  ERIC BIBER, CHRISTOPHER  ELMENDORF,   NICHOLAS MARANTZ,   & MOIRA
                               O'NEILL*


       California faces a dire housing  crisis. California's land-use
   regulatory system remains  a key driver of this crisis. State law
   grants local governments broad power to craft their own regulations
   on how to review and approve  housing development. Though  state
   law may  limit a locality's ability to outright deny some types of
   housing development, local governments  can and  do use creative
   ways to stall approvals or functionally deny housing by making it
   infeasible to develop. One such strategy is to demand more intensive
   environmental review of new housing projects under the California
   Environmental  Quality Act (CEQA)  than what  state law requires.
   More intensive environmental review can create substantial delay
   and uncertainty, increasing the costs for the construction of new
   housing. Although the state has made many efforts to streamline the
   process of both local land-use regulation and CEQA review, delays
   and uncertainty remain.
       We propose that the state address this ongoing problem by (1)
  issuing an authoritative map of urban infill priority areas (IPAs)
  where   new  housing   is expected  to provide   net social  and
  environmental  benefits, and (2) limiting the scope of environmental
  review, within the IPAs, to environmental impacts identified by the
  city or members of the public within a brief temporal window and
  demonstrated   by the proponent  of environmental   review to be
  significant. In effect, the law would presume no impact from new


*Professor of Law, University of California, Berkeley; Martin Luther King, Jr. Professor of
Law, UC Davis; Associate Professor, Department of Urban Planning & Public Policy, Uni-
versity of California, Irvine; Associate Professor of Law, General Faculty, University of
Virginia School of Law. Thanks to Sarah Joffe for helpful research assistance, and to Na-
talie Kuffel for helpful comments. Disclosure: Professor Elmendorf provided volunteer le-
gal advice to the author and sponsors of a bill mentioned in this paper (Assembly Bill 1633
(AB 1633), ch. 768, 2023-2024 Leg. Sess. (Cal. 2023)).


[221]

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most