About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

17 U. St. Thomas J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 178 (2023-2024)
Eminent Domain, Property Rights, and the State

handle is hein.journals/tjlpp17 and id is 185 raw text is: 









EMINENT DOMAIN, PROPERTY RIGHTS, AND THE

                               STATE

                          KEN  PENNINGTON*

        The great Dutch jurist Hugo Grotius coined the term dominium
eminens  in his De iure belli ac pacis.' In spite of some contemporary
criticism of the terminology, Grotius' concept  has entered most  legal
systems. The dictionary of legal terms by John Bouvier, as revised by John
Rawle, defined eminent domain as the superior right of property subsisting
in sovereignty and the power to take private property for public use.2 In
modem   law  public use has been  a tricky concept. In an egregiously
decided Supreme  Court case, Kelo v. New London in 2005 granted the state
the right to confiscate land for the use of a private developer. Forty-five
states then passed eminent domain laws  to prevent public use ever again
being interpreted that way.3
        Grotius thought that eminent domain meant that all the public and
private property rights ultimately reside in the country, state, or city and not
in individuals. Consequently, today private property is a contingent right
at best; contingent upon the pleasure of the state.
        In the ancient world, philosophers thought property rights emerged
as human  beings began to live in villages, towns, and cities. They generally
agreed that in society's most primitive state, people possessed all property
in common.4   The  Romans   were  the first to create a jurisprudence to

* Kelly-Quinn professor of ecclesiastical and Legal History, emeritus, The Catholic
University of America, Washington, D,C.
1 See discussion at the end of this essay.
2 FRANCIS RAWLE,  BOUVIER'S LAW  DICTIONARY  AND CONCISE  ENCYCLOPEDIA
(8th ed., vol. 2 1914).
3 Conservatives were especially enraged by the decision E.g., Gideon Kanner, Kelo
v. New London: Bad Law,  Bad Policy, and Bad Judgment, 38 URB. LAw. 201
(2006). See Eric Rutkow, Case Comment, Kelo v. City of New London, 30 HARV.
ENV'T. L. REV. 261 (2006) (for a balanced assessment).
' Plato and Aristotle had similar views on property; Plato argued that private
property should not exist and that even wives should be held in common, an idea
that Gratian incorporated into his Decretum at D.8 d.p.c.1: Unde apud Platonem
illa civitas iustissime ordinata traditur in qua quisque proprios nescit affectus. See
Stephan Kuttner et al., Gratian and Plato, in CHURCH AND GOVERNMENT IN THE
MIDDLE  AGES: ESSAYS PRESENTED TO C.R. CHENEY  ON HIS 70TH BIRTHDAY, 93
(1976).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most