About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

78 Fordham L. Rev. 181 (2009-2010)
Best Evidence and the Wayback Machine: Toward a Workable Authentication Standard for Archived Internet Evidence

handle is hein.journals/flr78 and id is 183 raw text is: BEST EVIDENCE AND THE WAYBACK MACHINE:
TOWARD A WORKABLE AUTHENTICATION
STANDARD FOR ARCHIVED INTERNET
EVIDENCE
Deborah R. Eltgroth *
This Note addresses the use of archived Internet content obtained via the
Wayback Machine, a service provided by the Internet Archive that accesses
the largest online digital collection of archived Web pages in the world.
Given the dynamic nature of the World Wide Web, Internet content is
constantly changed, amended, and removed. As a result, interim versions
of Web pages have limited life spans. The Internet Archive indexes and
stores Web pages to allow researchers to access discarded or since-altered
versions. In the legal profession, archived Web pages have become an
increasingly helpful form of proof Intellectual property enforcers have
recognized the value of the Internet Archive as a tool for tracking down
infringers, but evidence from the Internet Archive has rarely been admitted
at trial. This Note surveys the handful ofjudicial opinions and orders that
comment on the admission of Internet Archive evidence and explores the
conflict underlying these approaches. As an alternative to the courses they
have taken, this Note urges courts to treat the introduction of archived Web
pages as implicating a best evidence issue in addition to an authentication
question.  Under this approach, courts would decide using evidence
sufficient to the purpose, but not necessarily admissible at trial, whether the
archived page qualifies as a duplicate of a page that once appeared on
the Web. Beyond that, courts would apply authentication standards already
developed to decide whether a reasonable jury could find, based only on
admissible evidence, whether proffered evidence accurately represents the
page stored on the Internet Archive server and, if necessary, whether the
original page accurately represented material placed on the originating site
by the site's owner or operator. With this additional step, reliable evidence
from the Wayback Machine can become as easily admitted as any other
Intern et-derived proof.

* J.D. Candidate, 2010, Fordham University School of Law; B.A., 2006, UCLA. I would
like to thank my advisor, Professor James Kainen, for his tremendously valuable help and
insight. Thank you also to my family and friends for their constant encouragement, patience,
and support.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most