About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

51 Envtl. L. Rep. 10026 (2021)
An Enduring American Heritage: A Substantive Due Process Right to Public Wild Lands

handle is hein.journals/elrna51 and id is 28 raw text is: Copyright © 2021 Environmental Law Institute, Washington, DC. Reprinted with permission from ELRO, http://www.eli.org, 1-800-433-5120.
AN ENDURING AMERICAN HERITAGE:
A SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS RIGHT
TO PUBLIC WILD LANDS
by Ariel Strauss
Ariel Strauss is Of Counsel at Greenfire Law, P.C., in Berkeley, California.

magine, on account of an economic downturn associ-
ated with massive defense spending,' or a change in
regulatory philosophy,2 or a pandemic,3 the U.S. Con-
gress enacted legislation duly signed by the president to sell
virtually all federal wild lands to the highest bidder with-
out restriction. Would such action be constitutional?
The principles behind this question are now of monu-
mental importance. In the absence of significant changes
Author's Note: I am grateful for the help of many and wish to
specifically thank my colleague Jessica Blame for numerous
comments and insights, Animal Legal Defense Fund Senior
Policy Director Carter Dillard for a wealth of material on John
Locke, Brandeis University Prof. Brian Donahue for introducing
me to essential historical literature on this subject, and UCLA
School of Law Prof. Adam Winkler for his generous criticism. I
also thank the editors of ELR for their suggestions and correc-
tions. All errors and deficiencies are, of course, solely my own.
1.  Following proposed resolutions in the U.S. House of Representatives (H.R.
Res. 265, 97th Cong. (1981)) and the U.S. Senate (S. Res. 231, 97th Cong.
(1981)) to sell off federal property to reduce the national debt, in 1982,
President Ronald Reagan directed federal agencies to sell off excess prop-
erty. Exec. Order No. 12348, 47 Fed. Reg. 8547 (Mar. 1, 1982) (directing
disposition of real property holdings no longer essential to their activities
and responsibilities), revoked by Exec. Order No.12512, §4, 50 Fed. Reg.
18453 (Mar. 5, 1985); see also JAMES MUHN & HANSON R. STUART, OP-
PORTUNITY AND CHALLENGE: THE STORY OF BLM 220-231 (1988); Sales of
Public Land: A Problem in Legislative and Judicial Control of Administrative
Action, 96 HARV. L. REv. 927 (1983) (contending executive policy of sale
violated 43 U.S.C. §1701(a)(i)).
2.  Ideological and practical opposition to absentee federal land ownership
gained increased support in recent election cycles, though not to the degree
of total divestment from federal holdings. Heather Hansman, Congress Moves
to Give Away National Lands, Discounting Billions in Revenue, GUARDIAN,
Jan. 19, 2017, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jan/19/
bureau-land-management-federal-lease; Jonathan B. Jarvis & Destry Jarvis,
The Great Dismantling ofAmerica's National Parks Is Under Way, GUARDIAN,
Jan. 10, 2020, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jan/10/
us-national-parks-dismantling-under-way (former director of the National
Park Service (NPS) describing systematic dismantling of a beloved institu-
tion to enable mineral extraction); see generally Richard D. Clayton, The
Sagebrush Rebellion: Who Should Control the Public Lands, 1980 UTAH L.
REV. 505 (1980) (discussing historical source of western opposition to fed-
eral land control).
3. Exec. Order No. 13927, Accelerating the Nation's Economic Recovery From
the COVID-19 Emergency by Expediting Infrastructure Investments and
Other Activities, 85 Fed. Reg. 35165 (June 9, 2020); see, e.g., Paul Hannon,
Global Economy Faces Hard Winter Despite Covid-19 Vaccine Hopes, WALL
ST. J., Dec. 1, 2020, https://www.wsj.com/articles/global-economy-faces-
difficult-winter-despite-covid-19-vaccine-hopes-11606822321?st=u0jg8syr
4uhkg6y&reflink=desktopwebsharepermalink (global economy shrunk by
over 4% in 2020).

in federal land management practices and a coordinated
program to reverse the buildup of greenhouse gases in the
atmosphere, several studies predict that significant portions
of the nation's wild lands will be irreparably and drasti-
cally altered from their historic natural state.4 Congress-
man Radl Grijalva (D-AZ) explains: It's really difficult
to imagine Glacier National Park without glaciers, Joshua
Tree National Park without these trees. Yet, the evidence
is clear that we may be facing just that kind of future.5 In
light of the pattern of government refusal to address cli-
mate change's effect on federal lands, it may fall to citi-
zens to overcome petrochemical and agribusiness support
for current policies, by directly vindicating public rights to
wild lands in the courts.6
4.  STEPHEN SAUNDERS ET AL., NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL &
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CLIMATE ORGANIZATION, NATIONAL PARKS IN PERIL:
THE THREATS OF CLIMATE DISRUPTION (2009), available at https://roc-
kymountainclimate.org/website%20pictures/National-Parks-In-Peril-final.
pdf; Press Release, NPS, National Park Service Report Confirms Climate
Change in National Parks (July 2, 2014), https://www.nps.gov/aboutus/
news/release.htm?id=1609 (NPS director: This report shows that climate
change continues to be the most far-reaching and consequential challenge
ever faced by our national parks.); Patrick Gonzalez et al., Disproportion-
ate Magnitude of Climate Change in United States National Parks, 13 ENV T
RSCH. LETTERS 104001 (2018) (special analysis of historic and projected
temperatures across 417 national parks shows special vulnerability because
they set aside extreme environments), available at https://iopscience.iop.
org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aade09/pdf; Alex Horton, Climate Change
Is Destroying Our National Parks at an Alarming Rate, Study Finds, WASH.
POST, Sept. 25, 2018, https://www.washingtonpost.com/energy-environ-
ment/2018/09/25/climate-change-is-destroying-our-national-parks-an-
alarming-rate-study-finds/ (discussing research); Kara Manke, National
Parks Bear the Brunt of Climate Change, BERKELEY NEWS, Sept. 24, 2018,
https://news.berkeley.edu/2018/09/24/national-parks-bear-the-brunt-of-
climate-change/ (National parks aren't a random sample-they are remark-
able places and many happen to be in extreme environments especially
vulnerable to climate change.).
5. The Impacts of Climate Change on America's National Parks: Hearing Before the
House Subcomm. on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands, 111th Cong.
(2009) (statement of Rep. Radl Grijalva), available at https://www.govinfo.
gov/content/pkg/CHRG-111 hhrg48662/html/CHRG-111 hhrg48662.
htm.
6. This Comment does not address the political question doctrine or other
jurisprudential impediments to substantive court review of this question.
But see Juliana v. United States, 947 F.3d 1159, 1174 n.9, 50 ELR 20025
(9th Cir. 2020) (petition for rehearing pending Nov. 16, 2020) (lawsuit
against federal government for fossil fuel policies causing climate change
harms is not a political question but lacks justiciability). For an example of a
legislative proposal addressing some of these issues, see the American Public
Lands and Waters Climate Solution Act of 2019, sponsored by Rep. Radl
Grijalva (D-Ariz.) (H.R. 5435, 116th Cong. (introduced Dec. 16, 2019))

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REPORTER

51 ELR 10026

1-2021

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most