About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

21 B. C. Third World L. J. 69 (2001)
The Ayahuasca Patent Revocation: Raising Questions about Current U.S. Patent Policy

handle is hein.journals/bctw21 and id is 75 raw text is: THE AYAHUASCA PATENT REVOCATION:
RAISING QUESTIONS ABOUT CURRENT
U.S. PATENT POLICY
LE.AN M. FECTEAU*
Abstract: This Note explores the discriminatory effect of U.S. patent
law and policy on indigenous commulities in developing countries. For
years, Western researchers have relied upon local people to point them
to useful regional plants and animals so that they could then isolate,
develop and patent the chemical compounds found in the organisms.
Yet, the U.S. patent system does not recognize or value the traditional
knowledge of indigenous groups regarding their regional biodiversit.
Rather, the researchers who isolate the compounds can obtain a patent
with no recognition for the indigenous knowledge upon which they
relied. Recently, the World Trade Organization has succeeded at
globalizing Western intellectual property systems through international
treaties. These efforts have met with significant resistance in several
developing countries. The controversy over the ayahuasca patent is one
example  of developing   countries' opposition  to  Western-style
intellectual property rights. By implementing the suggestions described
in this Note, the United States could ensure that indigenous lowledge
would be recognized and thus could avoid future controversies like the
one surrounding the ayahuasca patent.
INTRODUCTION
In 1986, Loren Miller, an American scientist and entrepreneur,
obtained a U.S. patent on a strain of the ayahuasca vine.1 A)ahuasca, a
vine native to the Amazon Rain Forest, has been used by healers and
religious leaders throughout the Amazon for generations.2 For hun-
dreds of years, shamans have used ayahuasca to treat sicknesses, con-
tact spirits, and foresee the future.3 Many indigenous Amazon tribes
also view the plant as a sacred symbol of their religion.4
* Managing Editor, BOSTON COLLEGE TmHI WORLD LAWJoUNAL (2000-2001).
1 See Glenn M. Wser, PTO Rejedion of the Ayahuasca Patent Claim: Badground and
Analysis § 2, at http://ciel.org/ptorejection.html (Nov. 1999).
2Id.§1.
3Id.
4Id.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most