About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

37 Antitrust 18 (2022-2023)
Antitrust Concerns and Kanter's Cures

handle is hein.journals/antitruma37 and id is 20 raw text is: 

C O V E R S T O R I E S


Antitrust Concerns and Kanter's Cures

                     BY BRIANNA   L. ALDERMAN   AND  ROGER   D. BLAIR


      N  RECENT SPEECHES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
      Justice Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter
      has voiced his dissatisfaction with antitrust enforce-
      ment  and the level of concentration in U.S. markets.
         We  agree with some, but not all, of Kanter's con-
cerns. More importantly, we believe that Kanter's diagnoses
of the problems  and his prescription for their alleviation
misses the mark. In an effort to make a positive contribution
to improving  the competitive landscape across markets in
the U.S., we examine three issues: (1) the consumer welfare
standard, (2) merger policy, and (3) the protection of farm-
ers and workers.
   Initially, we examine the consumer welfare standard as a
guide for antitrust enforcement. Next, we review examples
of Supreme Court decisions that identify the goal of antitrust
policy as the protection of competition and the competitive
process. We point out that these cases illustrate the complex-
ity of this prescription. We argue that a stumbling block for
antitrust enforcement is oligopoly as there appears to be no
remedy  for the non-competitive outcomes that accompany
oligopoly. We then move on to review the Supreme Court's
merger decisions in the Philadelphia National Bank1 era. In
our opinion, a return to the good ole' days is not advisable.
Lastly, we examine Kanter's concern for farmers and work-
ers. Kanter's concern is not entirely misplaced, but the cause
can be found  in judicial decisions rather than lax enforce-
ment  efforts.

The  Consumer   Welfare  Standard
In his May 2022 Milton  Handler speech,2 Jonathan Kanter
seems to believe that protecting competition and promot-
ing consumer welfare are inconsistent, but they are not. The
major economic  benefit of competitive markets is that these
markets result in the maximization of consumer welfare and


  Brianna L. Alderman is a Ronald E. McNair Research Scholar, Depart-
  ment of Economics, University of Florida. Roger D. Blair is a Professor,
  Department of Economics, University of Florida, and affiliate faculty,
  Levin College of Law, University of Florida. We are grateful for the gener-
  ous financial support of the Robert F. Lanzillotti Public Policy Research
  Center, the Ronald E. McNair Scholars Program, and the University of
  Florida's Department of Economics. Neither of us has been retained by
  any party with an interest in the issues raised in this article.


social (or total) welfare. This is the economic rationale for
an antitrust policy that condemns monopoly  and monop-
sony, whether structural or cooperative, thereby protecting
competition and the competitive process. This is easy to see
with fundamental  economic principles.
   Monopoly  and  Seller Cartels. In Figure 1, D represents
the consumer  demand   for a good or service while S rep-
resents the supply of that good  or service. Competition
results in sales of Q units at a price of P1. Consumer surplus
is the difference between the consumer's willingness to pay
and the price that the market requires. In Figure 1, this is
the triangular area abP1. Producer surplus is the difference
between  the price received and the price that must be paid
to have the good or service provided. In Figure 1, producer
surplus is the triangular area Plbc. Social welfare is the sum
of consumer surplus and producer surplus, i.e., the triangu-
lar area abc in Figure 1.
   Given the demand  and supply of the good or service, no
other price and output combination will generate as much
surplus as the competitive solution. In fact, any deviation
from P1 and Q  will reduce social welfare.

   Price


a


P2


P5






C


0


                            S







 d
I     b

I     I
I     I

I     I                 D
I     I
    I  MR


Q2     Qi


Quantity


Figure 1


1 8    A N T I T R U S T

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most