About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

23 Med. & L. 19 (2004)
Embryonic Stem Cell Research: Terminological Ambiguity May Lead to Legal Obscurity

handle is hein.journals/mlv23 and id is 27 raw text is: 

Med Law (2004) 23:19-28                                  Medicine
                                                           and Law
                                                         OYOZMOT 2004

 Genetics and the Law

 EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH: TERMINOLOGICAL
 AMBIGUITY MAY LEAD TO LEGAL OBSCURITY
 Bart Hansen*


      Abstract: National regulation on embryonic stem cell research in the
      European Union is ambiguous, due to a lack of consistent scientific
      terminology as exemplified by the Dutch Embryos Act. To force a
      breakthrough in this ethically dubious research topic, a more careful use
      of terminology would be in the interest of both the scientific community
      and the lawmakers, in order to avoid terminology becoming associated
      with research or applications for which it is inappropriate. Therefore I
      will first clarify the technological possibilities in an age of biological control.
      Secondly, we will critically analyse the statements of the European
      Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine concerning embryo
      research and cloning. The Convention prohibits human reproductive
      cloning but does not take a clear position on so-called therapeutic cloning.
      Finally, we will give an overview of the most recent legislative initiatives
      within the European Union on this matter.
      Keywords: Stem cell; ethics; cloning; embryo; law; European
      Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine


INTRODUCTION: THERAPEUTIC CLONING: YES OR NO?
On October 9, 2001, a bill concerning research on human embryos was
introduced in the Dutch Parliament. Two English medical journals mentioned
the bill but each put their own interpretation on it. The Lancet stated: The
Netherlands approves embryonic stem cell research. [...] The new legislation
stipulates that researchers must only use spare embryos from IVF treatment
and the law forbids the production of embryos solely for research
purposes.' (Weber, 2001) The British Medical Journal however wrote:


*   Flanders Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium
I.  Italics mine


19

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most