About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

108 Ky. L.J. 111 (2019-2020)
Regulate Physician Restrictive Covenants to Improve Healthcare

handle is hein.journals/kentlj108 and id is 121 raw text is: REGULATE PHYsiciAN RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS TO IMPROVE HEALTHCARE Judy Ann Clausen' ABSTRACT The U.S. healthcare reform agenda seeks to expand patient choice and access, improve quality, and control costs. This Article argues these goals should govern enforceability ofphysician non-compete and non-solicitation agreements (restrictive covenants). Most jurisdictions apply a reasonableness test to assess the enforceability ofphysician restrictive covenants. Somejurisdictions hold physician non-competes per se invalid. Courts applying the reasonableness test often disrupt continuity of care and harm patients; continuity of care is key to patient health. Moreover, physicians departing a practice have an ethical obligation to notify patients of the physician s departure and how to transfer to the physician's new practice. Courts have heavily scrutinized a physician's notification to her patients to determine whether the physician crossed the nebulous line from fulfilling notification obligations to improper solicitation. Wary of liability for breach of a non-solicitation agreement, doctors will likely avoid fulfilling their obligations to notify patients, effectively preventing the patient from continuing treatment with her doctor. This Article articulates a model framework for evaluating restrictive covenants that protects patients and furthers healthcare reform goals. First, practices should be required to allow departing physicians to access patient info to fulfill patient notification obligations; courts should refuse to enforce non-solicitation agreements prohibiting physicians from soliciting their own patients. Otherwise, non-solicitation agreements potentially sever doctor-patient relationships. Next, courts should refuse to enforce restrictive covenants in a way that disrupts continuity of care or interferes with the doctor-patient relationship; courts should clarify that non-competes can only restrict the location where a physician practices and cannot prohibit a physician from treating her patients. Finally, states should enact transactional incentives to lower costs to patients and expandpatient choice and access by making covenant enforcement turn on the extent to which the covenant supports healthcare reform goals. Current frameworks fail to incentivize providers to: (1) accept lower reimbursement coverage such as TRICARE, Medicare, and Medicaid and (2) reduce patient costs. This Article's model provides these incentives. I Visiting Associate Professor of Law and Supervising Attorney, Veterans and Servicemembers Legal Clinic, University of Florida, Levin College of Law. The author would like to thank her brother, a psychiatrist, Dr. Ben Lacy, her father, a dentist, Dr. Ben Lacy, her sister-in-law, a pediatrician, Dr. Kimberly McDermott and her research assistant, Vanessa Gray.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most