About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

34 J. Value Inquiry 61 (2000)
Why Is Revenge Wrong?

handle is hein.journals/jrnlvi34 and id is 61 raw text is: kA The Journal of Value Inquiry 34: 61-69, 2000.                    61
© 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
Why Is Revenge Wrong?
SUZANNE UNIACKE
Philosophy Program, University of Wollongong, Wollongong 2522, New South Wales,
Australia
1. Considerations of Revenge
Revenge has roused sporadic philosophical interest in recent years but the
nature and morality of revenge have received surprisingly little systematic
attention in western philosophy. Many individual and collective actions are
motivated by the desire for revenge. The significance of revenge in human
affairs is reflected in its persistence as literary theme from Aeschylus to the
present. Contemporary films such as Presumed Innocent and FatalAttraction,
and novels such as The Life and Loves of a She-Devil, are tales of relentless
revenge which might be said to represent the adage Hell hath no fury like a
woman scorned.
Why certain types of acts, such as killing or interfering with the autonomy
of innocent people, are wrong can be philosophically important even when
there is strong general intuitive agreement that such acts are indeed wrong.
But the question Why is revenge wrong? is also philosophically complex
in a number of respects. We can recognise that the question is elliptical. We
are asking how and why the wrongfulness of an act stems from its having a
particular motive, namely the desire for revenge. Why is an act of retaliation
wrongful because it is an act of revenge as opposed, say, to being aimed at
self-defense?
The question is complicated by what we may provisionally call our moral
ambivalence toward revenge. On the one hand, to call an act an act of revenge
is typically a negative characterization, the attribution of a bad or an unseemly
motive. As a rationale of action, revenge is often considered petty, a poor
delight of feeble minds, something our higher nature should rise above.
Revenge is also widely regarded as morally improper. Some forms of revenge,
such as so-called revenge suicides which are intended to destroy the happiness
of another person, are generally considered morally shocking, sometimes
despicable. However, alongside a considerable range of negative evaluations
there are countervailing considerations. Acts of revenge can be sources of pride
and even of boasting, unlike acts motivated by, say, envy or spite which are

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most