About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

41 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 189 (2017)
Constitutional Challenges and Regulatory Opportunities for State Climate Policy Innovation

handle is hein.journals/helr41 and id is 193 raw text is: 




CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES AND REGULATORY
             OPPORTUNITIES FOR STATE CLIMATE
                           POLICY INNOVATION

                                    Felix Mormann*

         This Article explores constitutional limits and regulatory openings for innovative state
    policies to mitigate climate change by promoting climate-friendly, renewable energy. In the
    absence of a comprehensive federal policy approach to climate change and clean energy, more
    and  more states are stepping in to fill the policy void. Already, nearly thirty states have
    adopted renewable portfolio standards that create markets for solar, wind, and other clean
    electricity. To help populate these markets, a few pioneering states have recently started using
    feed-in tariffs that offer eligible generators above-market rates for their clean, renewable
    power.
         But renewable portfolio standards, feed-in tariffs, and other state climate policies have
     increasingly come under attack for alleged violations of the Constitution. How much latitude
     do states have when they experiment with innovative climate and clean energy policies? And
     which policy best protects states from the risk of lengthy and costly litigation over its
     constitutionality?
         To answer these crucial questions, this Article takes stock of recent litigation challenging
     the constitutionality of state renewable portfolio standards and feed-in tartffs. Qualitative
     analysis reveals markedly diferent constitutional risk profiles for both policies with portfolio
     standards more prone to Commerce Clause challenges and feed-in tariffs more likely to face
     Supremacy Clause challenges. These vulnerabilities have prompted widespread scholarly skep-
     ticism over both policies' constitutional viability when implemented at the state level, often
     accompanied by calls for sweeping legislative or judicial reform. Pushing back against the
     prevailing scholarly skepticism, this Article draws on recent precedent to make the case for joint
     implementation of both policies as a way to reduce, rather than exacerbate, a state's overall
     exposure to the risk of constitutional attacks on its climate and clean energy policy.


Introduction           ................................................ 190
.      Renewable   Portfolio  Standards  and  Feed-in   Tarifs:  A  Primer  ......    198
II.    Constitutional  Challenges   to State Renewable Portfolio Standards ...        200
      A.   Recent   Litigation  over State  Renewable   Portfolio  Standards....            203
      B. Sketching a Constitutional Risk Profile for State Renewable
           Portfolio  Standards  .......       ............................. 209

     Associate Professor, University of Miami School of Law;  Faculty Fellow, Stanford Law
     School. For their insightful comments on earlier versions of this work, I would like to thank
     David Adelman,  William Blatt, Jonathan Cannon, Ann Carlson, Caroline Corbin, Dan Far-
     ber, Jody Freeman, Michael  Froomkin, Michael  Gerrard, Fran Hill, Shi-Ling Hsu, Doug
     Kysar, Stanley Langbein, Richard Pierce, Jr., Stephen Schnably, Frank Valdes, and Rick
     Williamson. I would also like to thank participants in Columbia Law School's Sabin Collo-
     quium  on Innovative Environmental  Law  Scholarship, George Washington  Law  School's
     Shapiro Environmental  Law Symposium,  Northwestern  Law  School's Searle Conference on
     Federalism and  Energy, the University of Minnesota's Conference on Multi-dimensional
     Action to Address Climate Change,  and faculty workshops at Florida International Univer-
     sity School of Law and Texas A&M   School of Law. For her excellent research assistance, I
     am  grateful to Brittany Gunter. For their thoughtful comments and suggestions, I would like
     to thank my  editors, John Bullock and Joshua Lee.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most