About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

40 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. F. 41 (2016)
Fostering Competition in the 21st Century Electricity Industry

handle is hein.journals/helf40 and id is 58 raw text is: 




                 FOSTERING COMPETITION IN
       THE 21st CENTURY ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY

                              Michael Wara

                              INTRODUCTION

Today's electricity sector is shaped by two important trends. First,
        investor-owned electric utilities have been rapidly consolidating ever
        since repeal of the Public Utilities Holding Company Act (PUHCA)
in 2005. Second, the pace of technological innovation has increased, especially
at the grid edge. Numerous firms have emerged, most notably demand re-
sponse aggregators, solar power providers, and energy storage providers that
seek to sell energy services to customers, to wholesale electricity markets, or to
both. These firms often compete with the utilities in ways not anticipated by
the existing mechanisms that allow for and regulate competition in the electric-
ity sector. Taking this competition question seriously means reexamining the
application of the law of antitrust in electricity regulation. Elsewhere, I have
argued for renewed oversight of ratemaking by antitrust regulators.1 Here, I
argue for increased focus by the Department of Justice (DOJ) in exercising its
antitrust merger oversight authority.

    I.   CONSOLIDATION AND INNOVATION IN THE U.S. ELECTRICITY
                                 SECTOR

    The last twenty-five years have seen rapid consolidation in the investor-
owned electric power sector. While the power sector as a whole is still populat-
ed by a diverse set of public and private entities, most electricity demand in the
United States is served by investor-owned utilities. These utilities were limited
in horizontal scale for nearly seventy years by PUHCA, which was enacted in
the aftermath of the Insull utility holding company's collapse during the Great
Depression. PUHCA limited the degree to which utilities could combine to
efficiently exploit economies of scale.2 Beginning in the 1980s, federal energy
regulatory policies aimed at fostering competition encouraged consolidation in

'Associate Professor and Justin M. Roach, Jr. Faculty Scholar, Stanford Law School.
'See Michael Wara, Competition at the Grid Edge: Innovation and Antitrust Lawin the Electric
ity Sector, 25 N.Y.U. ENVTL. LJ. (forthcoming 2016).
2 See Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Mergers in the Electric Power Industry, in COMPETITION POLICY
AND MERGER ANALYSIS IN DEREGULATED AND NEWLY COMPETITIVE INDUSTRIES 7 (2005).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most