About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

5 Econ. Comm. Newsl. 24 (2005)
Post-Merger-Blockage Strategic Product Design Changes

handle is hein.journals/ecoconw5 and id is 24 raw text is: Economics Committee Newsletter
Post-merger-blockage Strategic Product Design Changes
Sencer Ecer*
LECG, LLC

In the summer of 2000, ZDNet.com and
Cnet.com were competing head-to-head.
These companies provide news and
information related to high-technology
products, such as hardware and software
reviews and price comparisons. Imitating
each other in virtually every aspect of the
business, their products converged to
virtually the exact same service. In
October 2000, the two companies merged in
a $1.6 billion deal.'
Given the minimal likelihood of an antitrust
challenge for these online companies, it is
not hard to imagine that these two
companies were anticipating the merger in
that previous summer. Indeed, the product
design changes they were engaging in, i.e.,
making their products more and more
substitutable, are consistent with the
equilibrium strategies under the expectation
of a merger according to the economic
2
theory. In contrast, firms expecting price
competition would make their products
more differentiated.3 Modeling product
designs as functions of the expectations of
firms about the future market structure has
an interesting implication in merger policy.
The U.S. antitrust authorities seem to be
making their merger approval decisions
based on pre-and post-merger price, that is,
consumer welfare, comparisons.4 The
results discussed in this paper imply that a
more correct comparison would be between
post-merger and post-merger-blockage
prices. This implication follows from the
considerations that product designs are
functions of the expectations of firms about
the future state of competition, and product
differentiation is often an effective way of

sustaining higher prices after learning that a
merger is unlikely. The main conclusion is
that post-merger-blockage strategic product
differentiation (or, in general, after the
introduction of a stricter merger policy) may
undo the benefits to consumers of the
merger-blockage. Thus, the antitrust
authority may be overestimating the benefits
to consumers of a merger blockage by using
a wrong benchmark.
This result is reminiscent of the famous
critiques of the Chicago school, for example,
the Lucas Critique5 or the Peltzman
Critique6 of safety regulations - e.g. people
driving less carefully obeying mandatory
seat belt rules, but neutralizing its effect. As
such, it is a policy- irrelevance result.
However, much remains to be explored, as
the literature in this area is very recent.
In the rest of the article, I first discuss the
standard results related to the strategic usage
of product designs in price competition and
price collusion or merger. Then, I link these
results to the strategic usage of product
designs in anticipation of a merger, and
present the implications of such a link in
merger policy both at the general level and
for a specific merger decision.
Strategic Product Designs
The literature addressing the role of product
design in price competition is extensive. As
illustrated by the two seminal papers in the
area, the result that firms differentiate their
products to soften price competition is very
robust. 7 Moreover, under important
conditions product differentiation is
excessive relative to the social optimum.8

Volume~~~ 5,Nmbr                     Srng20

Volume 5, Number I

Spring 2005

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most