About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

24 Brown J. World Aff. 39 (2017-2018)
Engaging in Whataboutery instead of Protecting Rights

handle is hein.journals/brownjwa24 and id is 39 raw text is: 








    Engaging in Whataboutery

    Instead of Protecting Rights




                        MEENAKSHI GANGULY



     I HAVE HEARD THIS TERM  a lot, most recently when I joined a heated BBC
Radio debate on India: whataboutery.
     This term does not refer to protesting inconsistencies by making a reasoned
argument  that presents opposing facts. Rather, whataboutery is used as a much
more  sinister challenge to human rights: the practice wherein perpetrators of
violations, or their supporters, do not deny the abuses, but instead justify them
and shout down  criticism by citing the wrongdoings of their victims. All too
often, they absolve collective punishment through whataboutery.
     Human   rights defenders often speak for the rights of the unpopular-in-  39
cluding those accused of terrorism, murder, or rape-by calling for fair trials and
protections from torture or ill treatment. While immediate revulsion to backing
the rights of alleged criminals is an understandable emotional response, it is the
responsibility of political leaders to uphold human rights and root societies in
rule of law.
     Instead, whataboutery has become a key part of populist political rhetoric,
appealing to ethnicity, race, or religion. These awful justifications appear to be
endless, particularly because social media offers a medium to express such views.
Even democracies that have long endorsed universal human rights are faltering,
whether in the United States, India, Australia, countries throughout Europe, or
younger nations such as Bangladesh. Confronting the dilemma of terror attacks,
rising crime, and a deluge of refugees is difficult, but instead of upholding human
rights principles, too many political and religious leaders are promoting harsh,
unrealistic alternatives. Their justifications for repressive countermeasures can

MEENAKSHI GANGULY is South Asia Director at Human Rights Watch (HRW). She has investigated a broad
range of issues, such as discrimination against marginalized groups, religious freedom, and protection of
women and children from violence. Prior to joining HRW, she served as the South Asia correspondent
for Time.
Copyright © 2017 by the Brown journal ofWorldAffairs


FALL/WINTER  2017  * VOLUME XXIV, ISSUE I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most