About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

49 Fed. Probation 27 (1985)
Addressing Inmate Mental Health Problems

handle is hein.journals/fedpro49 and id is 297 raw text is: Addressing Inmate Mental Health Problems
A New Direction for Prison Therapeutic Services
BY KENNETH ADAMS, Ph.D.
School of Criminal Justice, State University of New York at Albany

OF ALL THE MAJOR components of the
criminal justice system the correctional stage
traditionally has had the most explicitly avowed
therapeutic purpose. Within the context of prisons, an
assortment of therapeutic activities were usually available
to inmates. Individual therapy, group therapy, counsel-
ing, medication, self-help, and behavior modification are
among programs that have been offered. These programs
involved a variety of professionals (e.g., psychiatrists,
psychologists, social workers), working in a variety of set-
tings (e.g., one-to-one, small groups, residential com-
munities), using a variety of theoretical perspectives (e.g.,
psychiatric, psychodynamic, behavioral). Over the past
decade, however, critics have seriously challenged the fun-
damental. rationales for the therapeutic activities of
prisons. Some critics argue that the justifications for pro-
viding these services have been greatly oversold because
in their opinion when it comes to rehabilitating offenders
nothing works.' Others argue that even if we could
rehabilitate offenders society should allocate more
resources to other functions of the criminal justice system
such as deterring potential offenders.2
In the process of reevaluating the therapeutic activities
of correctional institutions, distinctions have been made
among services in terms of the goals they are attempting
to achieve and the client populations they are attempting
to reach. An important distinction is that between
therapeutic services attempting to achieve specific peno-
logical goals-the treatment of offenders so that they
might become law abiding citizens-and therapeutic serv-
ices intended to achieve more general health care goals-
the treatment of emotionally disordered individuals so
that they might function more effectively in social set-
tings. For convenience, we can refer to the former as cor-
rectional rehabilitation services and the latter as mental
health care services. Having recognized this distinction,
it is clear that most of the concern has been with correc-
tional rehabilitation services and that, by comparison,
there has been only limited interest in prison mental health
I Douglas Lipton. Robert Martinson. and Judith Wilks, The Effectiveness of Correctional
Treatment (New York: Praeger, 1975); Robe Martinson, What Works? Questions and
Answers about Prison Reform, The Public Interest. 35, 1974, pp. 22-S4.
2 Ernest van den Haag. Could Successful Rehabilitation Reduce the Crime Rate?, Jour-
nal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 73. 1982, pp. 1022-1035.
3 Ernest van den Haag. Punishing Criminals: Concerning a Very Old and Painful Ques-
tion (New York: Basic Books. 1975), pp. 117-123.

services. This article explores the distinction between cor-
rectional rehabilitation services and mental health serv-
ices and discusses the developments which are leading to
greater recognition of the need for prison mental health
services.
Distinguishing Among Therapeutic Services
One reason why the distinction between mental health
services and correctional rehabilitation services has not
been emphasized is that the distinction can be as simple
as it is complex. Simply stated, correctional rehabilita-
tion services are therapeutic interventions intended to ad-
dress the causes of criminality in an attempt to reduce
criminal propensities, while mental health services are
therapeutic interventions intended to address the causes
of mental illness in an attempt to alleviate emotional ad-
justment problems. The distinction is complex because
types of behaviors, causes of behaviors, and treatment
interventions available to change behaviors cannot always
be so neatly compartmentalized.
The complexity of the relationship between correc-
tional rehabilitation and mental health services stems
from the fact that the conceptual and operational
development of two services has historically been linked
together. In the early nineteenth century, as scientific ap-
proaches to the study of crime were starting to appear,
psychiatric theories vigorously stressed the notion that
mental illness is the major cause of crime. These theories
outlined a medical model of crime causation which
viewed crime as a disease of the mind that needed to
be cured. From about the middle of the 19th century
to about the middle of the 20th century, psychiatric
theories of criminality were widely accepted. Once the
proposition that mental illness is the cause of crime was
accepted, it followed logically that in order for thera-
peutic services to be rehabilitative in the penological sense,
they must be designed to address mental health problems.
From this point of view, there was little to be gained from
distinguishing between correctional rehabilitation services
and mental health services.
Criminologists have currently forsaken the view that
mental illness is a major cause of criminal behavior. This
is partly the case because the argument as it is usually
stated is circular.3 Criminal behavior is used as evidence
of mental illness and then mental illness is invoked to ex-

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most