About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

108 Iowa L. Rev. 2299 (2022-2023)
Religious Freedom and Abortion

handle is hein.journals/ilr108 and id is 2373 raw text is: Religious Freedom and Abortion Micah Schwartzman* & Richard Schragger* ABSTRACT: The demise of Roe v. Wade has raised a host of religious liberty questions that were submerged prior to the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. One question is whether state abortion bans are subject to challenge under the Establishment Clause, and state analogs, on the grounds that the government is forbidden from imposing religiously motivated laws. Another question is whether abortion restrictions violate the free exercise rights of people who are religiously motivated to seek, provide, or facilitate abortion services. We evaluate these claims by way of making a more sustained argument about the current politics of church-state relations under the Roberts Court. First, we argue that abortion bans should be vulnerable to Establishment and Free Exercise challenges under doctrinal standards adopted in recent cases, which have closely scrutinized laws burdening religiously motivated conduct. Second, despite the Justices' expansive approach to religious freedom, we nevertheless predict that the Supreme Court will deny exemptions in the abortion context. It will do so not only because of the Justices' political inclinations, but also because the doctrine is sufficiently malleable to allow rejecting certain kinds of religious liberty claims while accepting others. Third, we argue that this selective application of the Court's religious liberty jurisprudence vindicates a long-standing critique of judicially mandated free exercise exemptions, namely, that such exemptions too easily permit judges to pick and choose among religious claims. The Court's recent innovations in free exercise doctrine will favor certain religious believers over others, raising a broader question about whether it is possible for liberal and progressive believers to vindicate their claims to religious freedom. In the abortion context, those who demand exemptions to advance their belief that life begins at conception will receive them, while those * Hardy Cross Dillard Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law. For helpful comments and discussions, we thank Rachel Bayefsky, Alan Brownstein, Naomi Cahn, Danielle Citron, Dov Fox, Frederick Gedicks, Linda Greenhouse, Katherine Franke, Jessie Hill, Aaron Kemper, Andrew Koppelman, Leah Litman, Douglas NeJaime, James Nelson, Elizabeth Reiner Platt, Benjamin Potash, Olivia Roat, Zalman Rothschild, Elizabeth Sepper, Reva Siegel, and Nelson Tebbe. * Walter L. Brown Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law. 2299

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most