About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

73 Fla. L. Rev. 143 (2021)
Beyond Bail

handle is hein.journals/uflr73 and id is 143 raw text is: BEYOND BAIL

Jenny E. Carroll*
Abstract
From the proliferation of community bail funds to the implementation
of new risk assessment tools to the limitation and even eradication of
monetary bail, reform movements have altered the landscape of pretrial
detention. Yet, reform movements have paid little attention to the
emerging reality of a post-monetary-bail world. With monetary bail an
unavailable or disfavored option, courts have come to rely increasingly
on nonmonetary conditions of release. These nonmonetary conditions can
be problematic for many of the same reasons that monetary bail is
problematic and can inject additional bias into the pretrial system.
In theory, nonmonetary conditions offer increased opportunities for
release over monetary bail and can be narrowly tailored to accomplish
specific goals. Yet, the proposition that nonmonetary conditions
accomplish their purported goals is untested and unsettled. Pretrial
release conditions are often imposed at the conclusion of a remarkably
brief pretrial hearing and in a near rote fashion, with little or no evidence
that the conditions are necessary to avoid the risk or risks that fuel them.
Defendants-many of whom are unrepresented at these hearings-may
be ill-equipped, financially or otherwise, to comply with these conditions.
Noncompliance may place defendants at risk of either additional criminal
charges or future pretrial detention.
This Article argues that the reduction or eradication of monetary bail
alone has not, and will not, ensure a fair and unbiased system of pretrial
detention, nor will it ensure that poor and marginalized defendants will
benefit from pretrial release. Rather, these reforms have shifted the
burden of release from paying monetary bail to paying fees for a laundry
list of pretrial release conditions. If pretrial detention reform is to achieve
meaningful results, it must address not just the most apparent barrier to
release-the fee charged in the form of bail-but all barriers that promote
pretrial incarceration and impose unjustified burdens on defendants
awaiting trial.
* Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis Professor of Law, University of Alabama School of
Law. Thanks to Adam Steinman, Judith Resnik, Sandra Mayson, Lauryn Gouldin, Shima
Baradaran Baughman, Courtney Lollar, Amy Kimpel, Richard Delgado, Jean Stefancic, Jocelyn
Simonson, Andrew Ferguson, Russell Gold, Sarah Demarais, Jancy Hoeffel, Shaun Ossei-Owusu,
Andrea Roth, Valena Beety, Justin Murray, Vida Johnson, Skylar Albertson, Tobie Smith,
Harshila Levya, Maria Bardo-Colon, Adam Danneman and participants at the 2020 Wake Forest
Symposium on Bail Reform, 2019 CrimFest conference at Brooklyn Law School, the 2018
Southeast Criminal Law Scholars meeting at Emory University School of Law. Finally, thank you
to the editors and members of the Florida Law Review for their thoughtful editing.

143

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most