About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

10 Rev. Eur. Comp. & Int'l Envtl. L. 37 (2001)
International Environmental Law and Human Rights: Towards the Explicit Recognition of Traditional Knowledge

handle is hein.journals/reel10 and id is 37 raw text is: 


RECIEL 10 (1) 2001. ISSN 0962 8797


International Environmental Law and

  Human Rights: Towards the Explicit

Recognition of Traditional Knowledge



                                 Anja Meyer


INTRODUCTION

The international community, until recently, paid scant
attention to indigenous and local communities' tra-
ditional knowledge of biological resources. Such knowl-
edge was only applied by these communities for their
own  use in medicine and agriculture. With the advent
of biotechnology, however, traditional knowledge has
acquired a commercial value that it did not possess
before, leading to calls for protection to ensure indigen-
ous and local communities have a reasonable share of
the benefits generated by the use of their knowledge.
Further, as cases of exploitation of indigenous and local
communities are reported,' these groups wish to ensure
that their knowledge is not used without their prior
informed consent.

This discussion is paralleled in the arena of human
rights, in particular with regard to the emerging rights
of indigenous  peoples. Traditional knowledge  has
found explicit recognition within human rights docu-
ments  on indigenous peoples yet it is international
environmental law that first flagged the issue of tra-
ditional knowledge for international attention. The
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has emerged
as  the primary  instrument  permitting indigenous
groups to express their interests and demands for the
protection of their knowledge. In some cases, these
demands  even go beyond the scope and objectives of
the Convention.

In the following sections, this article will give an over-
view of the existing international environmental instru-
ments as well as the human rights instruments which
are relevant to traditional knowledge. Such an overview
does not  intend to manifest any separation of tra-
ditional knowledge into environmental concerns on the
one side and human rights issues on the other. As tra-


1 See on different cases A. Jacanimijoy, Initiatives for the Protection
of the Rights of the Possessors of Traditional Knowledge, Indigenous
Peoples and Local Communities, document presented at the World
Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Roundtable on Intellectual
Property and Indigenous Peoples on 23/24 July 1998,
(WIPO/INDIP/RT/98/4E, 4).


ditional knowledge is a subject for both environmental
and human  rights law, possible ways of protecting such
knowledge should not be confined to only one of these
two areas but take all different aspects into account.

Before turning to the different instruments, the central
term 'traditional knowledge' will be defined, the holders
of such  knowledge  identified, and the relationship
between  traditional knowledge and biological diver-
sity explained.

The  overview of international environmental instru-
ments will show an emerging recognition of indigenous
and local communities and their traditional knowledge.
Indigenous and local communities and their traditional
knowledge  can not only be found in the Rio Declar-
ation, Agenda 21 and the Forest Principles, but also in
internationally binding conventions such as the Con-
vention to Combat Desertification and the CBD. This is
detailed in the section 'The explicit recognition of tra-
ditional knowledge in environmental law'.

Besides  environmental instruments,  human   rights
instruments are relevant in this context, namely Con-
vention No.  169 Concerning  Indigenous and Tribal
Peoples in Independent Countries of the International
Labour Organization, the United Nations Draft Declar-
ation on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and - on a
regional level - the Proposed American Declaration on
the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (see the section 'Tra-
ditional knowledge and human rights').

As no specific ways and means for protection of tra-
ditional knowledge exist, the World Intellectual Pro-
perty Organization (WIPO) has also taken up work on
traditional knowledge. While so far WIPO has  been
mainly concerned with identifying needs and concerns
of holders of traditional knowledge, WIPO will now
move  on to address these needs  and concerns (see
'WIPO's   activities with  regard   to  traditional
knowledge').

In conclusion, this article argues that, while no specific
standards for the protection of traditional knowledge
exist at the international level, two emerging principles


0 Blackwell Publishers Ltd. 2001, 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA.


37

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most