About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

24 Litig. 3 (1997-1998)
How to Write: A Memorandum from a Curmudgeon

handle is hein.journals/laba24 and id is 7 raw text is: Trial Balloon
How to Write:
A Memorandum from a Curmudgeon

To: New Associate
From: Curmudgeon
Welcome to the firm.
To work at this firm, you must know
how to write. Here are the rules. Follow
them.
I make three assumptions about all
of your written work. First, it will con-
tain no typographical errors. Second, it
will contain no grammatical errors.
Third, all citation forms will be correct.
Please review your written work before
you hand it to me to be sure that my
assumptions hold true.
Style
Here are the rules of style. Follow
them.
First, write in short sentences. If a
sentence runs on for more than three
and one-half typed lines, break the sen-
tence in half. Make it two sentences.
Second, put two or three paragraphs
on a typed page. If a single paragraph
fills the whole page, break the para-
graph in half. Make it two paragraphs.
Third, use only the active voice. At
this firm, we write: Jim threw the ball.
Not: The ball was thrown by Jim.
Fourth, when you have a choice,
always use an action verb instead of the
verb to be and an adjective. At this
firm, we write: The rule applies here.
Not: The rule is applicable here.
Fifth, start each paragraph with a
topic sentence. This is important. Few
people do it. You will do it.
Sixth, use many headings and sub-
headings to break up your memorandum
or brief. Little pieces are easier to read.
Seventh, when you have a choice
between using the word which and
using the word that, the word that
is correct. (There are exceptions to this
rule. Do not worry about them. If you

by Mark Herrmann
follow my rule, you will be right 95 per-
cent of the time. If I think that an excep-
tion applies, I will make the change.)
Eighth, do not start a sentence with
the word however. Rewrite the sen-
tence to put the word however in the
middle of the sentence. (Again, there
are exceptions to this rule. Do not
worry about them. If you follow my
rule, you will be right 95 percent of the
time. If I think that an exception
applies, I will make the change.)
Ninth, do not use the phrase in
order to. Use to instead.
Finally, it is your obligation to fol-
low these rules. It is not my obligation
to find your mistakes and fix them. You
must develop the self-discipline to read
your final work with an eye toward
finding and correcting each of the nine
errors listed above.
Mark Herrmann is with the Cleveland office of
Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue.

I have a great deal of self-discipline.
I will read your work and fix your mis-
takes. This, however, is not my job. It is
better for your career if you fix your
own mistakes; I do not enjoy fixing
them for you.
Discussing a Case
When you are writing a legal memo-
randum for internal use, there is only
one proper way to discuss a case. This
is the way:
In Smith v. Jones,
1. Somebody sued somebody for
something, OR
Somebody asked the court to do
something.
2. The trial court held something.
(The trial court did not dis-
cuss something or analyze
something or believe some-
thing; it HELD something.
Ordinarily, a trial court grants
or denies a motion, or enters a
judgment. Use the proper verb
to describe the holding.)
3. The appellate court held some-
thing. (Ordinarily, an appellate
court will affirm, reverse,
vacate, or remand.)
4. Now, you can say anything else
about the case that you care to.
If you start chatting about the case
before you have covered items 1, 2, and
3, I will notice your error. I will change
your memorandum and make it right. I
will know that you lack self-discipline.
Why do I insist on a rigid formula for
discussing cases? Because my clients
prefer to win.
When I discuss a case in a brief, I
think carefully about the persuasive
force of the precedent. I prefer to cite
cases where the trial court did what my
opponent is seeking here, and the
appellate court reversed. By discussing
the holding of that case in my brief, I

LITIGATION Fall 1997

3

Volume 24 Number I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most