About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

35 J. Am. Acad. Matrimonial Law. 1 (2022-2023)
Equality, Gestational Erasure, and the Constitutional Law of Parenthood

handle is hein.journals/jaaml35 and id is 15 raw text is: Gestational Erasure Equality, Gestational Erasure, and the Constitutional Law of Parenthood by Katharine K. Baker* Abstract This article calls into question the abundance of academic writing that criticizes, as inconsistent with equality principles, the constitu- tional law of parenthood. Some of this criticism, concerned with gen- der stereotypes, argues that the current doctrine's preferential treatment of gestational mothers inexcusably discriminates against fa- thers. Other critics focus on how the Supreme Court's approach to gestational investment excludes same sex partners from parental rights. Both of these critiques argue that the work of gestation has been overvalued. They both endorse a kind of gestational erasure, but they differ sharply on where they root the essence of parenthood. Those concerned about equal treatment for fathers root parenthood in genetics. Those concerned about equal treatment for same sex part- ners root parenthood in parental investment. This article highlights the tension between these positions and challenges those willing to erase the relevance of gestation at both a normative and practical level. It explains how discounting the relevance of gestation will have serious consequences for the law of abortion, adoption, and custody, placing already vulnerable women at more risk of being controlled by men they want to escape. Further, this article argues that the current constitutional doctrine, which recognizes the salience of gestation, necessarily incorporates what LGBTQ advocates argue must be incor- porated into decisions about parenthood: parental investment. What is inconsistent with LGBTQ equality in parenthood is not a regime that recognizes gestational investment, but one that reifies the genetic essentialism on which the gender-stereotype critique relies. INTRODUCTION In the last ten years there has been a flurry of academic writ- ing criticizing the constitutional law of parenthood. This scholar- * University Distinguished Professor of Law, IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. Thanks to Michelle Oberman and all of my colleagues who have made comments over the years on the arguments I've finally brought together in this piece. Vol. 35, 2022 1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most