About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

80 Fordham L. Rev. 73 (2011-2012)
To Transfer or Not to Transfer: Identifying and Protecting Relevant Human Rights Interests in Non-Refoulement

handle is hein.journals/flr80 and id is 75 raw text is: TO TRANSFER OR NOT TO TRANSFER: IDENTIFYING AND PROTECTING RELEVANT HUMAN RIGHTS INTERESTS IN NON-REFOULEMENT Vijay M Padmanabhan* Human rights law imposes upon States an absolute duty not to transfer an individual to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing he or she will be tortured or subjected to cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment. This protection, called non-refoulement, emanates from a theory of human rights that recognizes rights fulfillment requires States to protect those within their jurisdiction from rights violations perpetrated by third parties, including other States. Generally human rights law recognizes that resource constraints and/or competing rights restrict protection duties. But such limitations have not been recognized in the non-refoulement context. In recent years the obligation to provide non-refoulement protection has run into conflict with the State's obligation to protect its public from aliens suspected of involvement in terrorism. Expulsion is the traditional tool available to States to mitigate the threat posed by dangerous aliens. With this tool removed, States often lack an alternative route to mitigate this threat, with criminal prosecution and indefinite detention pending deportation not available for various reasons. The result has been numerous cases where States have been forced either to release dangerous aliens back onto the street, consistent with international law, or to find alternative means to deal with the threat in the shadow of human rights law. This Article argues that there is a clash of human rights duties that arises in these transfer situations: the State's duty to protect aliens from post- transfer mistreatment conflicts with its duty to protect members of the public from rights violations committed by dangerous private persons within society. Human rights law has in recent years recognized a duty on * Assistant Professor of Law, Vanderbilt University Law School. Attorney-Adviser at the U.S. Department of State, 2003-08. The opinions and characterizations in this Article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official positions of the United States. Special thanks to Jonathan Eskow and James Fantau for their work as research assistants on this piece. Also thanks to Geoffrey Corn, Ashley S. Deeks, Ryan Goodman, Monica Hakimi, Michel Rosenfeld, Matthew Waxman, Ingrid Wuerth, and the Junior Faculty Working Group at Cardozo Law School without whose thoughtful engagement this piece would not be possible. 73

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most