About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

17 Ohio St. Bus. L.J. 53 (2023)
"Grossly Negligent Utilities," "Unimaginable Property Damage" and the Scope of Liability Insurers' Duty to Indemnify Subrogated Property Insurers - Probative and Empirical Inferences from Courts' Divided Subrogation and Indemnification Decision

handle is hein.journals/eblwj17 and id is 59 raw text is: 






         GROSSLY NEGLIGENT UTILITIES,
UNIMAGINABLE PROPERTY DAMAGE, AND THE
     SCOPE OF LIABILITY INSURERS' DUTY TO
        INDEMNIFY SUBROGATED PROPERTY
     INSURERS-PROBATIVE AND EMPIRICAL
       INFERENCES FROM COURTS' DIVIDED
       SUBROGATION AND INDEMNIFICATION
                         DECISIONS


                         WILLY  E. RICE*

                            SYNOPSIS:


    Each  year, extreme weather, natural disasters and allegedly
    grossly  negligent investor-owned utilities concurrently
    destroy property, persons and lives. In the wake, billions of
    dollars are lost. Given utilities' general immunity under the
    judicially created filed-rate or filed-tariff doctrine, residential
    and  commercial owners are precluded from filing ordinary-
    negligence  actions against utilities. Thus, many injured
    consumers  try to settle their property-loss claims with their
    insurers. Some property insurers satisfy the make-whole
    doctrine and cover all losses. Most insurers, however, refuse to
    settle any claim. Or, they partially compensate the insureds. Yet,
    an overwhelming majority of property insurers are increasingly
    filing subrogation actions against utilities and the latter's
    liability insurers---demanding to be totally reimbursed for the
    entire value of each property-loss or personal-injury claim.
    Should the most profitable property insurers in the world have
    standing to file duty-to-indemnity actions against utilities-if the
    insurers refuse to fully compensate injured property owners
    after natural disasters and energy interruptions? The question
    has produced  conflicting judicial rulings-given that a few
    states' anti-subrogation statutes are ambiguous.  Should
    unsophisticated utility customers have a right to file ordinary-
    negligence actions against utilities? The answer might be easy-
    given  utilities' ever-rising rates as well as politically
    conservative and liberal state supreme courts' negligence-
    based, utility-maintenance and pro-consumers decisions. The
    Article explains the origin and substance of utilities-caused,
    subrogation and indemnification disputes. It also presents the
    results of an empirical study to help explain the judicial

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most